Suppr超能文献

免疫球蛋白M(IgM)弓形虫抗体检测中的假阳性结果及确证检测的重要性:普乐可复弓形虫IgM检测

False-positive results in immunoglobulin M (IgM) toxoplasma antibody tests and importance of confirmatory testing: the Platelia Toxo IgM test.

作者信息

Liesenfeld O, Press C, Montoya J G, Gill R, Isaac-Renton J L, Hedman K, Remington J S

机构信息

Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Research Institute, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, CA 94301, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jan;35(1):174-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.174-178.1997.

Abstract

Although tests for detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) toxoplasma antibodies have been reported to have a high degree of accuracy, it is well recognized by investigators in the United States and Europe that false-positive results may occur with many of these tests, at times to an alarming degree. Unfortunately, this information is not well documented in the literature. Studies on various toxoplasma IgM test kits are frequently flawed. The investigators often use reference tests which have not previously been carefully evaluated as well as sera that were not appropriate to answer the question of how often false-positive results might occur. We recently had the unique opportunity to evaluate the accuracy of the Platelia Toxo IgM test in 575 serum samples obtained during an outbreak of toxoplasmosis which occurred in 1995 in the Capital Regional District of British Columbia, Canada. When compared with results obtained in a reference IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the Platelia Toxo IgM test had a sensitivity of 99.4%, specificity of 49.2%, positive predictive value of 51.9%, negative predictive value of 99.3%, and an overall agreement of 67.0%. In an attempt to resolve discrepancies between these two tests, a serological profile (Sabin-Feldman dye test, IgA and IgE antibody tests, differential agglutination [AC/HS] test, and IgG avidity method) was performed. Of 153 serum samples that were positive in the Platelia Toxo IgM test and negative in the IgM ELISA, 71 (46.4%) were negative in the Sabin-Feldman dye test. Of the serum samples that were positive in the dye test, 77 (93.9%) had a serological profile most compatible with an infection acquired in the distant past. These results reveal high numbers of false-positive results in the Platelia Toxo IgM test and highlight the importance of appropriate evaluation of commercial tests that are currently being marked. Our results also emphasize the importance of confirmatory testing to determine whether the results of an IgM antibody test reflect the likelihood of a recently acquired infection.

摘要

尽管据报道检测免疫球蛋白M(IgM)弓形虫抗体的试验具有高度准确性,但美国和欧洲的研究人员都清楚地认识到,许多此类试验可能会出现假阳性结果,有时程度令人担忧。不幸的是,这一信息在文献中并未得到充分记录。对各种弓形虫IgM检测试剂盒的研究常常存在缺陷。研究人员经常使用此前未经过仔细评估的参考试验以及不适合回答假阳性结果可能出现频率问题的血清。我们最近有一个独特的机会,对1995年在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省首府地区发生的一次弓形虫病疫情期间采集的575份血清样本中的普立泰利弓形虫IgM试验的准确性进行评估。与参考IgM酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的结果相比,普立泰利弓形虫IgM试验的灵敏度为99.4%,特异性为49.2%,阳性预测值为51.9%,阴性预测值为99.3%,总体一致性为67.0%。为了解决这两种试验之间的差异,进行了血清学分析(萨宾-费尔德曼染色试验、IgA和IgE抗体试验、鉴别凝集[AC/HS]试验以及IgG亲和力方法)。在普立泰利弓形虫IgM试验中呈阳性而在IgM ELISA中呈阴性的153份血清样本中,71份(46.4%)在萨宾-费尔德曼染色试验中呈阴性。在染色试验中呈阳性的血清样本中,77份(93.9%)的血清学分析结果与很久以前获得的感染最为相符。这些结果揭示了普立泰利弓形虫IgM试验中存在大量假阳性结果,并突出了对目前正在销售的商业试验进行适当评估的重要性。我们的结果还强调了进行确证试验以确定IgM抗体试验结果是否反映近期获得感染可能性的重要性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验