Suppr超能文献

接受柳氮磺吡啶、奥沙拉嗪或美沙拉嗪维持治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者中5-氨基水杨酸的吸收与代谢

5-amino salicylic acid absorption and metabolism in ulcerative colitis patients receiving maintenance sulphasalazine, olsalazine or mesalazine.

作者信息

Stretch G L, Campbell B J, Dwarakanath A D, Yaqoob M, Stevenson A, Morris A I, Rhodes J M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Dec;10(6):941-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1996.85257000.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

All 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) preparations are potentially nephrotoxic, but there has been concern that newer delivery systems may increase this risk, either because of altered absorption or altered metabolism. Previous studies of 5-ASA absorption and excretion have usually either been performed in healthy controls or have only examined short-term therapy. 5-ASA and N-acetyl-5-ASA have therefore been measured in blood samples, and N-acetyl-5-ASA in urine samples, from patients with ulcerative colitis on long-term maintenance with different 5-ASA preparations and compared with sensitive markers of renal damage.

METHODS

Patients receiving mesalazine (Asacol) (n = 13), sulphasalazine (n = 12) or olsalazine (Dipentum) (n = 8), all at doses within the recommended range were studied. Six-hour and trough serum concentrations of 5-ASA and N-acetyl-5-ASA and 24-h urinary excretion of N-acetyl-5-ASA were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Absorption of 5-ASA, assessed as 24-h excretion of N-acetyl-5-ASA expressed as molar % of ingested dose, was greater in patients receiving mesalazine, 23.25 +/- 10.65% (mean +/- s.d.; n = 13), than those receiving sulphasalazine (11.16 +/- 10.52%, n = 12; P = 0.003) or olsalazine (9.70 +/- 3.89%, n = 8; P < 0.002). The ratio of 5-ASA: N-acetyl-5-ASA in the serum 6 h after dose was also greater with mesalazine (1.02 +/- 0.44, mean +/- s.d.) than sulphasalazine (0.54 +/- 0.44, P < 0.02) or olsalazine (0.38 +/- 0.44, P < 0.005). Urinary markers of tubular damage were increased in four of 33 patients, but showed no correlation with concentration of 5-ASA or N-acetyl-5-ASA in serum and N-acetyl-5-ASA in urine, nor with lifetime dose or average daily dose of 5-ASA.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ulcerative colitis receiving maintenance 5-ASA therapy there was greater absorption and less acetylation of 5-ASA from mesalazine (Asacol) compared with sulphasalazine or olsalazine, but no evidence from this study that this resulted in increased nephrotoxicity.

摘要

背景

所有5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)制剂都有潜在的肾毒性,但人们担心新的给药系统可能会增加这种风险,这可能是由于吸收改变或代谢改变所致。以往关于5-ASA吸收和排泄的研究通常是在健康对照者中进行的,或者只考察了短期治疗。因此,我们对长期使用不同5-ASA制剂维持治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者的血样中的5-ASA和N-乙酰-5-ASA以及尿样中的N-乙酰-5-ASA进行了测定,并与肾损伤的敏感标志物进行了比较。

方法

研究了接受美沙拉嗪(艾迪莎)(n = 13)、柳氮磺胺吡啶(n = 12)或奥沙拉嗪(得舒特)(n = 8)治疗的患者,所有剂量均在推荐范围内。采用高效液相色谱法测定5-ASA和N-乙酰-5-ASA的6小时和谷浓度以及N-乙酰-5-ASA的24小时尿排泄量。

结果

以摄入剂量的摩尔百分比表示的N-乙酰-5-ASA的24小时排泄量来评估,接受美沙拉嗪治疗的患者5-ASA的吸收量为23.25±10.65%(平均值±标准差;n = 13),高于接受柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗的患者(11.16±10.52%,n = 12;P = 0.003)或奥沙拉嗪治疗的患者(9.70±3.89%,n = 8;P < 0.002)。给药后6小时血清中5-ASA与N-乙酰-5-ASA的比值,美沙拉嗪组(1.02±0.44,平均值±标准差)也高于柳氮磺胺吡啶组(0.54±0.44,P < 0.02)或奥沙拉嗪组(0.38±0.44,P < 0.005)。33例患者中有4例肾小管损伤的尿标志物升高,但与血清中5-ASA或N-乙酰-5-ASA的浓度以及尿中N-乙酰-5-ASA的浓度均无相关性,也与5-ASA的终生剂量或平均日剂量无关。

结论

在接受5-ASA维持治疗的溃疡性结肠炎患者中,与柳氮磺胺吡啶或奥沙拉嗪相比,美沙拉嗪(艾迪莎)对5-ASA的吸收更多,乙酰化程度更低,但本研究没有证据表明这会导致肾毒性增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验