Suppr超能文献

奥沙拉嗪和美沙拉嗪治疗的非活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者中5-氨基水杨酸的全身吸收情况。

Systemic absorption of 5-aminosalicylic acid in patients with inactive ulcerative colitis treated with olsalazine and mesalazine.

作者信息

Karamanolis D G, Papatheodoridis G V, Xourgias V

机构信息

Gastroenterology Department, 'Tzaneion' General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996 Nov;8(11):1083-8. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199611000-00010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the systemic load of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) as a basis for potential long-term toxicity during treatment in usual dosage with olsalazine (Dipentum) and one controlled-release mesalazine preparation (Salofalk) in patients with inactive ulcerative colitis.

DESIGN

Open, randomized, crossover study. TREATMENT SCHEDULE: Olsalazine 500 mg twice daily for 7 days and mesalazine 500 mg thrice daily for 7 days consecutively.

PATIENTS

Fifteen patients (12 males/3 females) aged between 18-70 years with ulcerative colitis in endoscopically confirmed remission for at least one month.

METHODS

A morning predose plasma sample and a 24-h urine collection on days 6 and 7 of each course were obtained from all patients for quantitative determination of 5-ASA and acetyl-5-ASA (Ac-5-ASA) concentrations. High performance liquid chromatography was used and all analyses were performed blindly on coded samples.

RESULTS

Treatment with mesalazine compared with olsalazine gave significantly higher levels of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA in plasma and urine. Maximum values and ranges of all variables were higher in the mesalazine group than in the olsalazine group. It is noteworthy that there was clear discriminance in the range of urine 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA concentrations after mesalazine and olsalazine treatment.

CONCLUSION

  1. The mesalazine preparation used, in comparison with olsalazine given in usual dosages, causes significantly higher levels of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA in plasma and urine in patients with inactive ulcerative colitis. 2. The lower systemic load of 5-ASA may reduce the potential risk of adverse events and in particular of nephrotoxicity.
摘要

目的

比较在常规剂量治疗期间,奥沙拉嗪(得舒特)和一种美沙拉嗪控释制剂(颇得斯安)在非活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者中5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)的全身负荷量,以此作为潜在长期毒性的依据。

设计

开放性、随机、交叉研究。治疗方案:奥沙拉嗪500毫克,每日两次,共7天;美沙拉嗪500毫克,每日三次,连续7天。

患者

15例年龄在18至70岁之间的溃疡性结肠炎患者(12例男性/3例女性),经内镜确认缓解至少1个月。

方法

在每个疗程的第6天和第7天,采集所有患者的一份早晨给药前血浆样本和一份24小时尿液样本,用于定量测定5-ASA和乙酰-5-ASA(Ac-5-ASA)浓度。采用高效液相色谱法,所有分析均对编码样本进行盲法操作。

结果

与奥沙拉嗪相比,美沙拉嗪治疗使血浆和尿液中的5-ASA和Ac-5-ASA水平显著升高。美沙拉嗪组所有变量的最大值和范围均高于奥沙拉嗪组。值得注意的是,美沙拉嗪和奥沙拉嗪治疗后尿液中5-ASA和Ac-5-ASA浓度范围存在明显差异。

结论

  1. 与常规剂量的奥沙拉嗪相比,所使用的美沙拉嗪制剂在非活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者的血浆和尿液中导致5-ASA和Ac-5-ASA水平显著升高。2. 5-ASA较低的全身负荷量可能会降低不良事件尤其是肾毒性的潜在风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验