• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管结石的原位体外冲击波碎石术:影响结石破碎的因素及改变治疗方式的合适疗程数研究

In situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: investigation of factors influencing stone fragmentation and appropriate number of sessions for changing treatment modality.

作者信息

Kim H H, Lee J H, Park M S, Lee S E, Kim S W

机构信息

Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea.

出版信息

J Endourol. 1996 Dec;10(6):501-5. doi: 10.1089/end.1996.10.501.

DOI:10.1089/end.1996.10.501
PMID:8972781
Abstract

To determine the factors influencing stone fragmentation and to suggest when to change treatment modality for ureteral calculi refractory to repetitive in situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), we analyzed 369 patients treated primarily by the second-generation lithotripter, Siemens Lithostar, from March 1989 to December 1993. Three hundred forty-two (92.7%) of the patients were ultimately free of stones after repetitive in situ SWL. The cumulative stone-free rates of the first, second, and third session were 64%, 81%, and 88%, respectively, and the increment in the cumulative stone-free rate thereafter with further repeated in situ SWL was minimal (p < 0.01). The cumulative stone-free rate at the third session was 89%, 87%, and 86% for proximal, middle, and lower ureteral stones, respectively (p > 0.05). The cumulative stone-free rate at the third session was 100%, 90%, 87%, 70%, 67%, and 50% for stones <5 mm, 6 to 10 mm, 11 to 15 mm, 16 to 20 mm, 21 to 25 mm, and >25 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). According to the radiopacity of the stone, the cumulative stone-free rate at the third session was 96% for stones with minimal opacity, 94% for those with moderate opacity, and 70% for highly opaque stones (p < 0.001). The cumulative stone-free rate at the second session was 100% without ureteral obstruction; 80% with mild, 57% with moderate, and 67% with severe obstruction; and 50% in patients with nonappearance of the kidney (p < 0.05). From these observations, it could be concluded that the factors influencing fragmentation were the size and radiopacity of the calculi and the degree of ureteral obstruction, whereas the location of the calculi did not influence the cumulative stone-free rate of repetitive in situ SWL. It is preferable to restrict in situ SWL to three sessions in patients with ureteral calculi refractory to shockwaves. An early change of treatment modality either to ureteroscopic manipulation or to open surgery would be recommended if there were risk factors as listed above.

摘要

为了确定影响结石碎裂的因素,并建议何时对反复原位体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗无效的输尿管结石改变治疗方式,我们分析了1989年3月至1993年12月期间主要采用第二代碎石机西门子Lithostar治疗的369例患者。342例(92.7%)患者经反复原位SWL后最终结石消失。第一次、第二次和第三次治疗的累计结石清除率分别为64%、81%和88%,此后进一步反复原位SWL时,累计结石清除率的增幅极小(p<0.01)。第三次治疗时,输尿管上段、中段和下段结石的累计结石清除率分别为89%、87%和86%(p>0.05)。第三次治疗时,结石直径<5mm、6至10mm、11至15mm、16至20mm、21至25mm和>25mm的累计结石清除率分别为100%、90%、87%、70%、67%和50%(p<0.001)。根据结石的不透X线性,第三次治疗时,不透X线程度最低的结石累计结石清除率为96%,中度不透X线的结石为94%,高度不透X线的结石为70%(p<0.001)。第二次治疗时,无输尿管梗阻患者的累计结石清除率为100%;轻度梗阻患者为80%,中度梗阻患者为57%,重度梗阻患者为67%;肾不显影患者为50%(p<0.05)。从这些观察结果可以得出结论,影响结石碎裂的因素是结石的大小、不透X线性和输尿管梗阻程度,而结石的位置并不影响反复原位SWL的累计结石清除率。对于对冲击波治疗无效的输尿管结石患者,原位SWL最好限制在三次治疗以内。如果存在上述危险因素,建议早期将治疗方式改为输尿管镜操作或开放手术。

相似文献

1
In situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: investigation of factors influencing stone fragmentation and appropriate number of sessions for changing treatment modality.输尿管结石的原位体外冲击波碎石术:影响结石破碎的因素及改变治疗方式的合适疗程数研究
J Endourol. 1996 Dec;10(6):501-5. doi: 10.1089/end.1996.10.501.
2
Two-year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy v ureteroscopic manipulation.输尿管结石的两年经验:体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜操作对比
J Endourol. 1998 Dec;12(6):501-4. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.501.
3
Extracorporeal piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: are second-generation lithotripters obsolete?输尿管结石的体外压电冲击波碎石术:第二代碎石机过时了吗?
J Endourol. 1999 Oct;13(8):543-7. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.543.
4
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for solitary distal ureteral stones: does the degree of urinary obstruction affect success?体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立性远端输尿管结石:尿路梗阻程度会影响治疗成功率吗?
J Endourol. 2004 Apr;18(3):237-40. doi: 10.1089/089277904773582822.
5
A simple position to provide better imaging of upper ureteral stones close to the crista iliaca during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the Siemens Lithostar.一种简单的体位,用于在使用西门子Lithostar进行体外冲击波碎石术时,对靠近髂嵴的上段输尿管结石提供更好的成像。
Eur Urol. 2004 Mar;45(3):352-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.10.012.
6
Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.体内或体外冲击波碎石术治疗远端输尿管结石?结石大小和数量对成功率的影响。
J Endourol. 1998 Aug;12(4):307-12. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.307.
7
Is measurement of stone surface area necessary for SWL treatment of nonstaghorn calculi?经皮肾镜碎石术治疗非鹿角形结石时,测量结石表面积是否必要?
J Endourol. 2002 May;16(4):215-20. doi: 10.1089/089277902753752151.
8
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗远端输尿管小结石的比较
Urol Int. 2004;73(3):238-43. doi: 10.1159/000080834.
9
Endoscopy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of distal ureteral stones: ten years' experience.输尿管下段结石治疗中内镜治疗与体外冲击波碎石术的比较:十年经验
J Endourol. 1999 Apr;13(3):161-4. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.161.
10
Salvage extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy after failed distal ureteroscopy.输尿管镜检查失败后挽救性体外冲击波碎石术
J Endourol. 2002 Aug;16(6):355-8. doi: 10.1089/089277902760261374.

引用本文的文献

1
Furosemide improves the stone clearance rate of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for kidney stones but not ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.呋塞米可提高体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的结石清除率,但对输尿管结石无效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Oct 15;14:17562872221128473. doi: 10.1177/17562872221128473. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes for Upper and Lower Ureteral Stones in Non-obese and Non-Pre-stented Adults: Is One Session Sufficient?非肥胖且未预先放置支架的成年人上下段输尿管结石的冲击波碎石术结果:单次治疗是否足够?
Cureus. 2022 Sep 26;14(9):e29592. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29592. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone.
治疗前肾积水对输尿管结石患者冲击波碎石成功率的影响。
Yonsei Med J. 2017 Sep;58(5):1000-1005. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.1000.
4
Predictive factors of the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones.输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的预测因素
Korean J Urol. 2012 Jun;53(6):424-30. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.6.424. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
5
Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效预测
Urol Res. 2011 Feb;39(1):51-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0274-5. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
6
Comparison of success rates and financial cost of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in situ and after manipulation for proximal ureteral stones.原位体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管上段结石手法治疗后成功率及费用的比较
Urol Res. 2003 Aug;31(4):286-90. doi: 10.1007/s00240-003-0337-y. Epub 2003 Jun 24.