• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过连续结肠镜检查确定的腺瘤结肠镜漏诊率。

Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.

作者信息

Rex D K, Cutler C S, Lemmel G T, Rahmani E Y, Clark D W, Helper D J, Lehman G A, Mark D G

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 1997 Jan;112(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70214-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70214-2
PMID:8978338
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The miss rate of colonoscopy for neoplasms is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the miss rate of colonoscopy by same day back-to-back colonoscopy.

METHODS

Two consecutive same day colonoscopies were performed in 183 patients. The patients were randomized to undergo the second colonoscopy by the same or a different endoscopist and in the same or different position.

RESULTS

The overall miss rate for adenomas was 24%, 27% for adenomas < or = 5 mm, 13% for adenomas 6-9 mm, and 6% for adenomas > or = 1 cm. Patients with two or more adenomas at the first examination were more likely than patients with no or one adenoma detected at the first examination to have one or more adenomas at the second examination (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-6.46). Right colon adenomas were missed more often (27%) than left colon adenomas (21%), but the difference was not significant. There was evidence of variation in sensitivity between endoscopists, but significant miss rates for small adenomas were found among essentially all endoscopists.

CONCLUSIONS

Using current colonoscopic technology, there are significant miss rates for adenomas < 1 cm even with meticulous colonoscopy. Miss rates are low for adenomas > or = 1 cm. The results suggest the need for improvements in colonoscopic technology.

摘要

背景与目的

结肠镜检查对肿瘤的漏诊率尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过同日连续结肠镜检查确定结肠镜检查的漏诊率。

方法

对183例患者进行了连续两次同日结肠镜检查。患者被随机分配由同一位或另一位内镜医师在相同或不同体位下进行第二次结肠镜检查。

结果

腺瘤的总体漏诊率为24%,直径≤5mm的腺瘤漏诊率为27%,直径6 - 9mm的腺瘤漏诊率为13%,直径≥1cm的腺瘤漏诊率为6%。首次检查发现两个或更多腺瘤的患者比首次检查未发现或仅发现一个腺瘤的患者在第二次检查时更有可能出现一个或多个腺瘤(比值比,3.3;95%置信区间,1.69 - 6.46)。右半结肠腺瘤的漏诊率(27%)高于左半结肠腺瘤(21%),但差异无统计学意义。有证据表明内镜医师之间的敏感性存在差异,但基本上所有内镜医师对小腺瘤的漏诊率都较高。

结论

使用当前的结肠镜检查技术,即使进行细致的结肠镜检查,直径<1cm的腺瘤仍有显著的漏诊率。直径≥1cm的腺瘤漏诊率较低。结果表明需要改进结肠镜检查技术。

相似文献

1
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.通过连续结肠镜检查确定的腺瘤结肠镜漏诊率。
Gastroenterology. 1997 Jan;112(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70214-2.
2
Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.影响连续结肠镜检查中息肉漏检率的因素。
Endoscopy. 2012 May;44(5):470-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291666. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
3
Lower Adenoma Miss Rate of Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy vs Routine White-Light Colonoscopy in a Prospective Tandem Study.计算机辅助检测辅助结肠镜检查与常规白光结肠镜检查在前瞻性串联研究中的腺瘤检出率较低。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Oct;159(4):1252-1261.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Missed adenomas during colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with Lynch Syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).林奇综合征(遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌)患者结肠镜监测期间漏诊的腺瘤
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2008 Nov;1(6):470-5. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0098.
5
The Miss Rate for Colorectal Adenoma Determined by Quality-Adjusted, Back-to-Back Colonoscopies.质量调整、背靠背结肠镜检查确定的结直肠腺瘤漏诊率。
Gut Liver. 2012 Jan;6(1):64-70. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.1.64. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
6
Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies.结直肠肿瘤性息肉的漏诊率:一项关于连续视频结肠镜检查的前瞻性多中心研究。
Endoscopy. 2008 Apr;40(4):284-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995618.
7
Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.筛查结肠镜检查中肠道准备不充分患者的腺瘤遗漏率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
8
Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO: a randomized controlled trial using a tandem colonoscopy approach.对比水下全结肠镜与标准 CO 检查的腺瘤和息肉遗漏率:使用串联结肠镜方法的随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):591-598. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.046. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
9
Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates.带帽式结肠镜检查:腺瘤漏诊率的随机、串联结肠镜检查研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):775-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.030. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
10
Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps.内镜三联成像用于结肠息肉检测与鉴别的临床评估
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Mar;7(3):288-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.10.025. Epub 2008 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors of Missed Adenoma Detected by Colonoscopic Polypectomy and Its Impact of the Endoscopic System.结肠镜息肉切除术漏诊腺瘤的危险因素及其对内镜系统的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Apr;70(4):1503-1510. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-08937-9. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Polyp Matching in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Pioneering CCE-Colonoscopy Integration Towards an AI-Driven Future.结肠胶囊内镜中的息肉匹配:开创CCE与结肠镜检查的整合,迈向人工智能驱动的未来。
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 21;13(23):7034. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237034.
3
The impact of linked color imaging on adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
联动式彩色成像对结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Endosc. 2025 Mar;58(2):225-239. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.072. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
4
Effectiveness of a novel artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy system for adenoma detection: a prospective, propensity score-matched, non-randomized controlled study in Korea.一种新型人工智能辅助结肠镜检查系统用于腺瘤检测的有效性:韩国一项前瞻性、倾向评分匹配、非随机对照研究。
Clin Endosc. 2025 Jan;58(1):112-120. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.168. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
Targeted biopsy of the prostate.前列腺靶向活检
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan;50(1):261-271. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04452-z. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
6
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies Using Active Learning and Monte Carlo Simulation.基于主动学习和蒙特卡罗模拟的结直肠癌筛查策略的成本效益分析。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):554-571. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241258224. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
7
The role of cap-assisted endoscopy and its future implications.帽辅助内镜检查的作用及其未来意义。
Clin Endosc. 2024 May;57(3):293-301. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.051. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
8
Occurrence of Colorectal Cancer After a Negative Colonoscopy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.炎症性肠病患者阴性结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的发生:系统评价和荟萃分析。
In Vivo. 2024 Mar-Apr;38(2):523-530. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13470.
9
Artificial intelligence for colorectal neoplasia detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.结肠镜检查中用于结直肠肿瘤检测的人工智能:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Nov 30;66:102341. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102341. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Cost-utility analysis of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in Italy.意大利实时人工智能辅助结肠镜检查的成本效用分析
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Nov 10;11(11):E1046-E1055. doi: 10.1055/a-2136-3428. eCollection 2023 Nov.