• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日一次阿米卡星联合头孢他啶治疗成人重症革兰阴性菌严重感染的疗效与安全性。

Efficacy and safety of once-daily amikacin in combination with ceftazidime in critically ill adults with severe gram-negative infections.

作者信息

Fayed D F, Dahmash N S, al-Zeer A H, Shibl A M, Huraib S O, Abu-Aisha H

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH) and College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Chemother. 1996 Dec;8(6):457-64. doi: 10.1179/joc.1996.8.6.457.

DOI:10.1179/joc.1996.8.6.457
PMID:8981187
Abstract

Forty critically ill adult patients with severe Gram-negative infection were treated with once-daily amikacin combined with ceftazidime. The mean age was 56.6 +/- 19 years and mean APACHE II score was 22.7 +/- 6.6. Forty percent of patients required mechanical ventilation. The mean creatinine clearance at onset of therapy was 59.4 +/- 28 ml/min. All bacterial isolates were sensitive to amikacin. Fixed doses of amikacin 15 mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, and 8 mg/kg body weight were given once daily to patients with estimated creatinine clearance of > 80 ml/min., 50-80 ml/min., and < 50 ml/min, respectively. Forty-two causative gram-negative bacteria were isolated from 40 patients. The most common bacteria were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18), and Escherichia coli (10). Overall clinical success and bacteriological eradication occurred in 85% and 87.5% of patients; 78.9% and 79% of patients with hospital-acquired infections; 90.5% and 95.2% of patients with community-acquired infections; and 62.5% and 81.3% of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, respectively. Therapeutic failure was documented in 15% of patients. Death due to infection was scored in two patients. The remaining were all due to persistence of the initial causative bacteria in patients with hospital-acquired infections. Persistence was documented with Ps. aeruginosa (2), Serratia spp. (1), and Acinetobacter spp. (1). Overall mortality occurred in 22.5% patients. Death unrelated to infection occurred in 7 patients. There was no clinical evidence of ototoxicity in any of our patients, however, nephrotoxicity was documented in 5%. In conclusion, once-daily amikacin combined with ceftazidime is practical, efficacious and probably safe in critically ill infected patients.

摘要

40例患有严重革兰阴性菌感染的成年危重症患者接受了每日一次的阿米卡星联合头孢他啶治疗。平均年龄为56.6±19岁,平均急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分为22.7±6.6。40%的患者需要机械通气。治疗开始时的平均肌酐清除率为59.4±28 ml/分钟。所有分离出的细菌对阿米卡星均敏感。对于估计肌酐清除率>80 ml/分钟、50 - 80 ml/分钟和<50 ml/分钟的患者,分别每日一次给予固定剂量的阿米卡星,剂量为15 mg/kg、12 mg/kg和8 mg/kg体重。从40例患者中分离出42株致病性革兰阴性菌。最常见的细菌是铜绿假单胞菌(18株)和大肠杆菌(10株)。总体临床成功率和细菌清除率分别为85%和87.5%;医院获得性感染患者中分别为78.9%和79%;社区获得性感染患者中分别为90.5%和95.2%;需要机械通气的患者中分别为62.5%和81.3%。15%的患者记录有治疗失败。两名患者因感染死亡。其余均是由于医院获得性感染患者中初始致病细菌持续存在所致。持续性感染记录于铜绿假单胞菌(2例)、沙雷菌属(1例)和不动杆菌属(1例)。总体死亡率为22.5%。7例患者死于与感染无关的原因。我们的任何患者均无耳毒性的临床证据,然而,5%的患者记录有肾毒性。总之,每日一次的阿米卡星联合头孢他啶在危重症感染患者中实用、有效且可能安全。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of once-daily amikacin in combination with ceftazidime in critically ill adults with severe gram-negative infections.每日一次阿米卡星联合头孢他啶治疗成人重症革兰阴性菌严重感染的疗效与安全性。
J Chemother. 1996 Dec;8(6):457-64. doi: 10.1179/joc.1996.8.6.457.
2
The efficacy and safety of isepamicin and ceftazidime compared with amikacin and ceftazidime in acute lower respiratory tract infection.异帕米星与头孢他啶联用对比阿米卡星与头孢他啶联用在急性下呼吸道感染中的疗效及安全性
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:129-35.
3
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of isepamicin and amikacin in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections caused by gram-negative organisms.
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:137-42.
4
Ceftazidime versus a combination of amikacin and ticarcillin in the treatment of severe infections.头孢他啶与阿米卡星联合替卡西林治疗严重感染的对比研究
Clin Ther. 1988;10(5):589-93.
5
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of isepamicin compared with amikacin in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and septicaemia.异帕米星与阿米卡星治疗医院获得性肺炎和败血症的疗效及安全性评估。
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:165-73.
6
Clinical and bacteriological efficacy, and practical aspects of amikacin given once daily for severe infections.阿米卡星每日一次给药治疗严重感染的临床和细菌学疗效及实际情况
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 May;27 Suppl C:91-103. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.suppl_c.91.
7
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of isepamicin and amikacin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.异帕米星与阿米卡星治疗皮肤及皮肤结构感染的疗效与安全性比较。
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:155-60.
8
Management of fever in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia: current role of ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy.
J Chemother. 2000 Jun;12(3):232-9. doi: 10.1179/joc.2000.12.3.232.
9
Influence of sepsis on higher daily dose of amikacin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients.脓毒症对危重症患者更高日剂量阿米卡星药代动力学的影响。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Feb;17(3):285-91.
10
Isepamicin once daily plus ceftriaxone versus amikacin plus ceftriaxone in febrile neutropenic patients.发热性中性粒细胞减少患者中,一日一次异帕米星联合头孢曲松与阿米卡星联合头孢曲松的对比研究
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:103-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Propensity-based study of aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.基于倾向评分法对严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者氨基糖苷类药物肾毒性的研究
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Dec;58(12):7468-74. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03750-14. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
2
Aminoglycosides in septic shock: an overview, with specific consideration given to their nephrotoxic risk.氨基糖苷类药物在感染性休克中的应用:综述,特别考虑其肾毒性风险。
Drug Saf. 2013 Apr;36(4):217-30. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0031-0.
3
Once-daily amikacin dosing in burn patients treated with continuous venovenous hemofiltration.
烧伤患者行连续性静脉-静脉血液滤过治疗时采用每日 1 次阿米卡星给药方案。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Oct;55(10):4639-42. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00374-11. Epub 2011 Aug 8.