Gust R, Gottschalk A, Schmidt H, Böttiger B W, Böhrer H, Martin E
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Dec;22(12):1345-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01709549.
To evaluate the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bi-level positive airway pressure (Bi-PAP) on extravascular lung water during weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting.
Prospective, randomized clinical study.
Intensive care unit at a university hospital.
Seventy-five patients following coronary artery bypass grafting.
After extubation of the trachea, patients were treated for 30 min with CPAP via face mask (n = 25), with nasal BiPAP (n = 25), or with oxygen administration via nasal cannula combined with routine chest physiotherapy (RCP) for 10 min (n = 25).
Extravascular lung water (EVLW), pulmonary blood volume index (PBVI) and cardiac index (CI) were obtained during mechanical ventilation (T1), T-piece breathing (T2), interventions (T3), spontaneous breathing 60 min (T4) and 90 min (T5) after extubation of the trachea using a combined dye-thermal dilution method. Changing from mechanical ventilation to T-piece breathing did not show any significant differences in EVLW between the three groups, but a significant increase in PBVI from 155 +/- 5 ml/m2 to 170 +/- 4 ml/m2 could be observed in all groups (p < 0.05). After extubation of the trachea and treatment with BiPAP. PBVI decreased significantly to 134 +/- 6 ml/m2 (p < 0.05). After treatment with CPAP or BiPAP, EVLW did not change significantly in these groups (5.5 +/- 0.3 ml/kg vs 5.0 +/- 0.4 ml/kg and 5.1 +/- 0.4 ml/kg vs 5.7 +/- 0.4 ml/kg). In the RCP-treated group, however, EVLW increased significantly from 5.8 +/- 0.3 ml/kg to 7.1 +/- 0.4 ml/kg (p < 0.05). Sixty and 90 min after extubation, EVLW stayed at a significantly higher level in the RCP-treated group (7.5 +/- 0.5 ml/kg and 7.4 +/- 0.5 ml/kg) than in the CPAP-(5.6 +/- 0.3 ml/kg and 5.9 +/- 0.4 ml/kg) or BiPAP-treated groups (5.2 +/- 0.4 ml/kg and 5.2 +/- 0.4 ml/kg). No significant differences in CI could be observed within the three groups during the time period from mechanical ventilation to 90 min after extubation of the trachea.
Mask CPAP and nasal BiPAP after extubation of the trachea prevent the increase in extravascular lung water during weaning from mechanical ventilation. This effect is seen for at least 1 h after the discontinuation of CPAP or BiPAP treatment. Further studies have to evaluate the clinical relevance of this phenomenon.
评估持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和双水平气道正压通气(Bi-PAP)对冠状动脉搭桥术后患者机械通气撤机过程中血管外肺水的影响。
前瞻性、随机临床研究。
大学医院重症监护病房。
75例冠状动脉搭桥术后患者。
气管拔管后,25例患者通过面罩接受CPAP治疗30分钟,25例患者接受经鼻BiPAP治疗,25例患者通过鼻导管吸氧并联合常规胸部物理治疗(RCP)10分钟。
采用联合染料热稀释法在机械通气期间(T1)、T形管呼吸期间(T2)、干预期间(T3)、气管拔管后自主呼吸60分钟(T4)和90分钟(T5)时获取血管外肺水(EVLW)、肺血容量指数(PBVI)和心脏指数(CI)。从机械通气转换为T形管呼吸时,三组间EVLW无显著差异,但所有组PBVI均从155±5 ml/m²显著增加至170±4 ml/m²(p<0.05)。气管拔管并用BiPAP治疗后,PBVI显著降至134±6 ml/m²(p<0.05)。CPAP或BiPAP治疗后,这些组的EVLW无显著变化(5.5±0.3 ml/kg对5.0±0.4 ml/kg以及5.1±0.4 ml/kg对5.7±0.4 ml/kg)。然而,在RCP治疗组中,EVLW从5.8±0.3 ml/kg显著增加至7.1±0.4 ml/kg(p<0.05)。气管拔管后60分钟和90分钟时,RCP治疗组的EVLW(7.5±0.5 ml/kg和7.4±0.5 ml/kg)显著高于CPAP治疗组(5.6±0.3 ml/kg和5.9±0.4 ml/kg)及BiPAP治疗组(5.2±0.4 ml/kg和5.2±0.4 ml/kg)。从机械通气至气管拔管后90分钟期间,三组间CI无显著差异。
气管拔管后面罩CPAP和经鼻BiPAP可防止机械通气撤机过程中血管外肺水增加。CPAP或BiPAP治疗停止后,这种作用至少持续1小时。需进一步研究评估此现象的临床相关性。