Suppr超能文献

延髓嘴端腹内侧ON和OFF细胞的背角投射靶点。

Dorsal horn projection targets of ON and OFF cells in the rostral ventromedial medulla.

作者信息

Fields H L, Malick A, Burstein R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1995 Oct;74(4):1742-59. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.4.1742.

Abstract
  1. The rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) participates in the modulation of nociceptive transmission by spinal cord neurons. Previous anatomic studies have demonstrated that RVM neurons project to laminae I, II, and V of the dorsal horn; laminae VII and VIII of the intermediate and ventral horns; the intermediolateral column; and lamina X. The RVM contains at least three physiologically defined classes of neurons, two of which, the ON and the OFF cells, have been implicated in nociceptive modulation. Because these cells classes are intermingled in the RVM, it has not been possible to determine the spinal laminar projection targets of ON and OFF cells by anatomic methods. Therefore in the current study we employed antidromic microstimulation methods to determine the laminar projections of two of the three classes of RVM neurons, the ON and the OFF cells. 2. In lightly anesthetized (with methohexital sodium) rats, single-unit extracellular recordings were made from 48 RVM neurons that were physiologically characterized as ON (30) or OFF (18) cells. The recording locations of 45 of these neurons were recovered. Thirty-seven were found in the nucleus raphe magnus and eight were located near its dorsal and lateral borders. 3. Thirty-two physiologically identified RVM neurons (18 ON and 14 OFF cells) were antidromically activated from the cervical spinal cord using a monopolar stimulating electrode. The stimulating electrode was moved systematically in the white matter until antidromic activation could be produced with currents of < or = 20 microA (6.1 +/- 0.7 microA, mean +/- SE). The points from which minimum currents were required to antidromically activate the neurons were located mainly in the ipsilateral dorsolateral funiculus (DLF) (27 of 32). In a few cases, lowest antidromic threshold currents were found near the border between the DLF and ventrolateral funiculus (VLF) or, rarely, in the VLF itself. In these cases, the cell recordings were found to be near the dorsal boundary of the RVM. 4. While one electrode was used to stimulate the parent axon in the lateral funiculus, a second was used to explore the gray matter for the presence of collateral branches. The identification of a branch was initially determined by an increase in antidromic latency. At the same rostrocaudal plane of the spinal cord, stimulation of the DLF induced an antidromic spike that invaded the neuron earlier than the antidromic spike elicited by stimulation in the gray matter. Collateral branches were confirmed by establishing that the location of the minimum threshold point for antidromic activation of the neurons from the second electrode was in the gray matter, that the minimum current required to antidromically activate the neuron from that point was too low to activate the parent axon in the DLF, and that a collision occurred between the spikes induced by the two stimulating electrodes. 5. In 17 cases, physiologically identified RVM neurons (10 ON and 7 OFF cells) were antidromically activated from the gray matter of the cervical spinal cord using a current of 8.4 +/- 2.1 (SE) microA. Minimum threshold points for antidromic activation were found in laminae I-II (3 ON and 4 OFF cells), lamina V (5 ON and 6 OFF cells), and regions ventral to the lateral reticulated area (3 ON and 2 OFF cells) of the gray matter. As indicated by these numbers, some neurons were antidromically activated from more than one gray matter region. In general, all OFF cells and 9 of 10 ON cells were antidromically activated from low threshold points in either laminae I-II or lamina V. 6. In six cases, neurons were activated from separate points located in two or three different laminae of the gray matter. Three OFF cells were activated from laminae I-II and V, one OFF cell and one ON cell were activated from lamina V and from more ventral points, and one ON cell was activated from laminae I-II and from points ventral to lamina V.
摘要
  1. 延髓头端腹内侧区(RVM)参与脊髓神经元对伤害性信息传递的调制。以往的解剖学研究表明,RVM神经元投射至背角的Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅴ层;中间角和腹角的Ⅶ和Ⅷ层;中间外侧柱;以及Ⅹ层。RVM至少包含三类生理特性不同的神经元,其中两类,即ON细胞和OFF细胞,参与伤害性调制。由于这些细胞类型在RVM中相互交织,因此无法通过解剖学方法确定ON细胞和OFF细胞的脊髓层投射靶点。因此,在本研究中,我们采用逆向微刺激方法来确定RVM三类神经元中的两类,即ON细胞和OFF细胞的层投射。2. 在轻度麻醉(用甲己炔巴比妥钠)的大鼠中,对48个生理特性鉴定为ON(30个)或OFF(18个)细胞的RVM神经元进行单单位细胞外记录。其中45个神经元的记录位置得以确定。37个位于中缝大核,8个位于其背侧和外侧边界附近。3. 使用单极刺激电极从颈脊髓逆向激活32个经生理鉴定的RVM神经元(18个ON细胞和14个OFF细胞)。刺激电极在白质中系统移动,直至用≤20微安的电流(6.1±0.7微安,平均值±标准误)能产生逆向激活。逆向激活神经元所需最小电流的点主要位于同侧背外侧索(DLF)(32个中的27个)。在少数情况下,最低逆向阈值电流出现在DLF与腹外侧索(VLF)的边界附近,或很少出现在VLF本身。在这些情况下,细胞记录位于RVM的背侧边界附近。4. 当一个电极用于刺激外侧索中的母轴突时,另一个电极用于探测灰质中是否存在侧支。侧支的识别最初通过逆向潜伏期的增加来确定。在脊髓的同一 rostrocaudal平面,刺激DLF诱发的逆向锋电位比灰质刺激诱发的逆向锋电位更早侵入神经元。通过确定从第二个电极逆向激活神经元的最小阈值点位于灰质中,从该点逆向激活神经元所需的最小电流过低而无法激活DLF中的母轴突,以及两个刺激电极诱发的锋电位之间发生碰撞,来确认侧支。5. 在17例中,用8.4±2.1(标准误)微安的电流从颈脊髓灰质逆向激活经生理鉴定的RVM神经元(10个ON细胞和7个OFF细胞)。逆向激活的最小阈值点出现在灰质的Ⅰ - Ⅱ层(3个ON细胞和4个OFF细胞)、Ⅴ层(5个ON细胞和6个OFF细胞)以及外侧网状区腹侧区域(3个ON细胞和2个OFF细胞)。如这些数字所示,一些神经元从多个灰质区域被逆向激活。一般来说,所有OFF细胞和10个ON细胞中的9个从Ⅰ - Ⅱ层或Ⅴ层的低阈值点被逆向激活。6. 在6例中,神经元从位于灰质的两个或三个不同层的不同点被激活。3个OFF细胞从Ⅰ - Ⅱ层和Ⅴ层被激活,1个OFF细胞和1个ON细胞从Ⅴ层和更腹侧的点被激活,1个ON细胞从Ⅰ - Ⅱ层和Ⅴ层腹侧的点被激活。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验