Rousseaux M, Godefroy O, Cabaret M, Bernati T
Service de Rééducation Neurologique, CHRU, Lille, France.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1996 Aug-Sep;152(8-9):517-27.
Disorders of executive function and motor control are considered to be classical consequences of prefrontal lesions. The aim of this study was to investigate these disorders and their evolution in a series of patients presenting with prefrontal and cingulate lesion following rupture of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Twenty one subjects were included, and assessed in the secondary and late post stroke phases. We have used the following tests to assess planning and/or execution time and performance: Trail Making test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, London Tower Test, Shopping Test of Martin, sequential gestual test and contradictory responses test from Luria. Correlations between these parameters were used to evaluate subjects strategy. In evaluation of execution time, patients were slower than controls, and the difference was more marked using the Trail Making Test (p < 0.01) and the London Tower Test (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the initiation time was increased in the London Tower Test (p < 0.01), this suggesting that they were slower than impulsive. Groups analysis showed that their performance level was most often similar to that of of controls, even in the secondary phase, with the exception of the number of problems solved whatever number of moves in the London Tower test (p < 0.01) and of the percentage of errors in the sequential motor task (p < 0.03). Similar results were observed in the evaluation of single cases. Correlations between execution time and performance were most often significant and negative, in patients and controls. These results suggest that the management of the speed-accuracy compromise was relatively similar, and that impulsivity, which associates reduction of time to poor performance, was absent or mild. Cingulate, and caudate lesions were identified as the source of most cognitive disorders.
执行功能和运动控制障碍被认为是前额叶病变的典型后果。本研究的目的是调查一系列前交通动脉瘤破裂后出现前额叶和扣带回病变的患者的这些障碍及其演变情况。纳入了21名受试者,并在中风后中期和晚期进行评估。我们使用了以下测试来评估计划和/或执行时间及表现:连线测验、威斯康星卡片分类测验、伦敦塔测验、马丁购物测验、连续手势测验以及卢里亚的矛盾反应测验。这些参数之间的相关性用于评估受试者的策略。在执行时间评估中,患者比对照组慢,使用连线测验(p < 0.01)和伦敦塔测验(p < 0.01)时差异更明显。此外,伦敦塔测验中的起始时间增加(p < 0.01),这表明他们比冲动型的人慢。分组分析表明,即使在中期,他们的表现水平通常与对照组相似,但伦敦塔测验中无论移动次数解决的问题数量(p < 0.01)以及连续运动任务中的错误百分比(p < 0.03)除外。在单病例评估中也观察到了类似结果。在患者和对照组中,执行时间与表现之间的相关性大多显著且为负。这些结果表明,速度-准确性权衡的管理相对相似,并且不存在或仅有轻微的冲动性,冲动性与时间减少和表现不佳相关。扣带回和尾状核病变被确定为大多数认知障碍的根源。