Krause K
Augenklinik Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1996 Aug-Sep;209(2-3):94-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035285.
The wearing of progressive lens poses a problem to two kinds of patients: those who are practically emmetropic and use reading glasses only, and ametropic patients whose eyes have been corrected for years with bifocals. The wearing of progressive lenses is generally not recommended for those presbyopes.
A group of individuals (n = 50) underwent refraction, and their addition was adjusted to their work and their age (44-72 years). They were then divided into two groups, one of which (n = 25) was equipped with bifocals (Telarc, Essilor) and the other (n = 25) with progressive lenses (Varilux Comfort, Essilor). After four weeks, the types of glasses were exchanged. After a further four weeks, each group used the original pair of glasses for another week. At the end of this phase, each of the test subjects was asked his opinion in favour of one or the other types of glasses. At each change of glasses, factors such as duration of the adaptation period, assessment of sight, general impression and time of use were recorded.
At the determination of refraction much attention must be given to mildly astigmatic patients in order to optimise the prescription of progressive lenses. Progressive lenses were just as well tolerated by the group of convinced bifocal wearers, even though the familiarisation period took up to two weeks, especially for the older patients. Once the progressive lenses had been accepted, bifocals were generally abandoned for good. This is mainly due to the quality of the progressive lenses, which favour precise vision even in intermediate zones. For most of the individuals who were previously fitted with reading glasses only, the demarcation line between the distant and near parts of the bifocal lens pose major problems. Whereas progressive lenses were accepted as readily as in the group previously fitted with bifocals, about 40% of the total individuals tested refused bifocal lenses.
In all, 96% of the participants considered progressive lenses good or very good. All recognised that progressive lenses represent the most aesthetic solution. However, in certain cases bifocal lenses together with progressive lenses remain interesting. For patients who were previously accustomed to reading glasses only, the duration of use of glasses with progressive lenses rose from 40% to 60% of the working day.
佩戴渐进多焦点镜片给两类患者带来了问题:一类是实际上屈光正常仅使用阅读眼镜的患者,另一类是多年来一直使用双焦点眼镜矫正视力的屈光不正患者。对于那些老花眼患者,通常不建议佩戴渐进多焦点镜片。
一组个体(n = 50)接受验光,并根据其工作和年龄(44 - 72岁)调整其附加度数。然后将他们分为两组,其中一组(n = 25)佩戴双焦点眼镜(Telarc,依视路),另一组(n = 25)佩戴渐进多焦点镜片(Varilux Comfort,依视路)。四周后,交换眼镜类型。再过四周后,每组再使用原来的那副眼镜一周。在这个阶段结束时,询问每个测试对象对其中一种或另一种眼镜的偏好意见。在每次更换眼镜时,记录适应期时长、视力评估、总体印象和使用时间等因素。
在验光时,对于轻度散光患者必须给予充分关注,以便优化渐进多焦点镜片的处方。即使适应期长达两周,尤其是对老年患者而言,渐进多焦点镜片在坚信双焦点眼镜的佩戴者群体中同样能被很好地耐受。一旦接受了渐进多焦点镜片,双焦点眼镜通常就会被永远弃用。这主要归因于渐进多焦点镜片的质量,即使在中间区域也有助于实现精确视力。对于大多数之前仅佩戴阅读眼镜的个体来说,双焦点镜片远用和近用部分之间的分界线会带来主要问题。而渐进多焦点镜片与之前佩戴双焦点眼镜的群体一样容易被接受,约40%的受试个体拒绝双焦点眼镜。
总体而言,96%的参与者认为渐进多焦点镜片良好或非常好。所有人都认识到渐进多焦点镜片是最美观的解决方案。然而,在某些情况下,双焦点镜片与渐进多焦点镜片仍各有优势。对于之前仅习惯佩戴阅读眼镜的患者,佩戴渐进多焦点镜片的使用时长从工作日的40%增加到了60%。