• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Optima散光隐形眼镜与CSI散光隐形眼镜的临床性能比较。

Clinical performance of the Optima toric contact lens versus the CSI toric contact lens.

作者信息

Bucci F A, Tanner J B, Moody K J, Myers P J

机构信息

Center for Contact Lens Research, Pugliese Eye Specialists, Kingston, PA, USA.

出版信息

CLAO J. 1997 Jan;23(1):43-8.

PMID:9001771
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical performance of the Optima soft toric contact lens versus the CSI soft toric contact lens.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients (five affected by allergies) were followed at 2-week intervals for 4 months in a prospective, randomized, double-masked study comparing the Optima soft toric contact lens to the CSI soft toric contact lens.

RESULTS

The patients preference evaluation revealed a statistically significant preference for the CIS toric lens in 14 of 16 variables including overall lens preference (P = 0.0001). The two remaining variables, lens awareness (P = 0.07) and foreign body sensation (P = 0.06), showed a trend toward a preference for the CSI toric lens. The less sensitive symptom ranking questionnaire revealed a significance for, or a trend toward, a significant difference in three of 10 variables, all in favor of the CSI toric lens. The mean degrees of axis rotation were 3.5* for the CSI lens and 7.6* for the Optima lens (P = 0.0001). Factor analysis identified a clustering of variables around specific ranked factors. Factors related to 1) allergy status (.93); 2) visual function (.87); 3) ocular surface (.82); and 4) refractive characteristics (.71) were most significant in determining the overall clinical performance of these toric lenses. Allergic patients significantly preferred the CSI toric lens for 15 of 16 variables, whereas non-allergic patients preferred the CSI lens for seven of 16 variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient preference, symptom ranking, and axis rotation analysis of this study revealed a superior performance by the CSI toric contact lens when compared to the Optima toric contact lens. Allergic patients revealed an even stronger and statistically significant preference for the CSI lens when compared to non-allergic patients.

摘要

目的

比较Optima软性散光隐形眼镜与CSI软性散光隐形眼镜的临床性能。

方法

在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究中,对21例患者(5例有过敏反应)每隔2周进行一次随访,为期4个月,比较Optima软性散光隐形眼镜与CSI软性散光隐形眼镜。

结果

患者偏好评估显示,在16项变量中的14项,包括总体镜片偏好方面,对CSI散光镜片存在统计学上的显著偏好(P = 0.0001)。其余两项变量,即镜片感知度(P = 0.07)和异物感(P = 0.06),显示出对CSI散光镜片有偏好的趋势。较不敏感症状排名问卷显示,在10项变量中的3项存在显著差异或有显著差异的趋势,所有这些都有利于CSI散光镜片。CSI镜片的平均轴旋转度数为3.5°,Optima镜片为7.6°(P = 0.0001)。因子分析确定了围绕特定排名因素的变量聚类。与1)过敏状态(.93);2)视觉功能(.87);3)眼表(.82);和4)屈光特征(.71)相关的因素在确定这些散光镜片的总体临床性能方面最为显著。过敏患者在16项变量中的15项显著偏好CSI散光镜片,而非过敏患者在16项变量中的7项偏好CSI镜片。

结论

本研究的患者偏好、症状排名和轴旋转分析显示,与Optima散光隐形眼镜相比,CSI散光隐形眼镜性能更优。与非过敏患者相比,过敏患者对CSI镜片表现出更强且具有统计学意义的偏好。

相似文献

1
Clinical performance of the Optima toric contact lens versus the CSI toric contact lens.Optima散光隐形眼镜与CSI散光隐形眼镜的临床性能比较。
CLAO J. 1997 Jan;23(1):43-8.
2
Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life.Synergeyes与软性散光镜片:与视力相关的生活质量
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Jul;84(7):593-7. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31811ece4a.
3
The clinical performance of the Surevue, Focus, and CSI daily wear lenses in allergic and normal contact lens patients.Surevue、Focus和CSI日戴型隐形眼镜在过敏性和普通隐形眼镜佩戴者中的临床表现。
CLAO J. 1994 Jul;20(3):159-66. doi: 10.1097/00140068-199407000-00006.
4
Clinical Evaluation of Large Diameter Rigid-Gas Permeable Versus Soft Toric Contact Lenses for the Correction of Refractive Astigmatism. A MultiCenter Study.大直径硬性透气性角膜接触镜与软性散光角膜接触镜矫正屈光性散光的临床评估:一项多中心研究
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 May;44(3):164-169. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000323.
5
A Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Toric Versus Spherical Contact Lenses on Vision and Eyestrain.一项评估散光型与球面型隐形眼镜对视力和眼疲劳影响的随机试验。
Eye Contact Lens. 2019 Jan;45(1):28-33. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000528.
6
Clinical evaluation of fitting toric soft contact lenses to current non-users.临床评估向当前非使用者适配环曲面软性隐形眼镜。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013 Mar;33(2):94-103. doi: 10.1111/opo.12028.
7
Lens rotation and spherocylindrical over-refraction as predictors for soft toric lens evaluation.晶状体旋转和球柱镜过矫作为软性散光人工晶状体评估的预测指标。
Optom Vis Sci. 1989 Sep;66(9):573-8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198909000-00002.
8
Visual acuity with spherical and toric soft contact lenses in low- to moderate-astigmatic eyes.低至中度散光眼佩戴球面和复曲面软性接触镜时的视力。
Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Oct;84(10):969-75. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318157c6dc.
9
Efficacy of Toric Contact Lenses in Fitting and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Contact Lens Wearers.散光隐形眼镜在隐形眼镜佩戴者中的验配效果及患者报告结局
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S296-S299. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000418.
10
Randomized Clinical Trial of Near Visual Performance with Digital Devices Using Spherical and Toric Contact Lenses.使用球面和散光隐形眼镜的数字设备近视力表现的随机临床试验。
Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Jul;97(7):518-525. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001540.

引用本文的文献

1
Silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel soft contact lenses for differences in patient-reported eye comfort and safety.硅水凝胶与水凝胶软镜在患者报告的眼部舒适度和安全性方面的差异。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 19;9(9):CD014791. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014791.pub2.