• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用缓冲利多卡因进行口腔内浸润麻醉时引发的疼痛。

Pain elicited during intraoral infiltration with buffered lidocaine.

作者信息

Primosch R E, Robinson L

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0426, USA.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 1996 Feb;9(1):5-10.

PMID:9002806
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of buffered lidocaine with self reporting of pain elicited during maxillary labial and palatal infiltrations of permanent canines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A standardized, prospective clinical trial of adult volunteers using a cross-over design of 20 paired injections using conventional 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as the control.

RESULTS

Failed to establish a significant reduction in pain scores for either injection site when buffered lidocaine was injected intraorally.

摘要

目的

评估在上颌恒尖牙唇侧和腭侧浸润麻醉期间使用缓冲利多卡因并让患者自我报告疼痛所产生的效果。

材料与方法

一项针对成年志愿者的标准化前瞻性临床试验,采用交叉设计,使用常规的2%利多卡因加1:100,000肾上腺素作为对照进行20对注射。

结果

当口腔内注射缓冲利多卡因时,未能证实两个注射部位的疼痛评分有显著降低。

相似文献

1
Pain elicited during intraoral infiltration with buffered lidocaine.用缓冲利多卡因进行口腔内浸润麻醉时引发的疼痛。
Am J Dent. 1996 Feb;9(1):5-10.
2
Decreasing the pain of local anesthesia: a prospective, double-blind comparison of buffered, premixed 1% lidocaine with epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine.减轻局部麻醉的疼痛:含肾上腺素的预混1%利多卡因缓冲液与新鲜混合肾上腺素的1%利多卡因的前瞻性双盲比较。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Jan;54(1):128-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.06.043.
3
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the injection pain and anesthetic onset of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine buffered with 5% and 10% sodium bicarbonate in maxillary infiltrations.一项前瞻性、随机、双盲比较研究,旨在比较上颌窦内注射 2%利多卡因与 1:100000 肾上腺素(用 5%和 10%碳酸氢钠缓冲)时的注射疼痛和麻醉起效时间。
J Endod. 2013 May;39(5):597-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
4
A comparison of intraoral injection discomfort produced by plain and epinephrine-containing lidocaine local anesthetic solutions: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, volunteer investigation.普通利多卡因与含肾上腺素利多卡因局部麻醉溶液产生的口腔内注射不适比较:一项随机、双盲、双侧对照、志愿者调查。
Anesth Prog. 2002 Spring;49(2):44-8.
5
Clinical evaluation of buffered local anesthetic.缓冲局部麻醉剂的临床评估
Gen Dent. 1995 Mar-Apr;43(2):182-4; quiz 186.
6
[Neutralization of lidocaine-adrenaline. A simple method for less painful application of local anesthesia].[利多卡因-肾上腺素的中和。一种减轻局部麻醉疼痛的简单方法]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2000 Aug 14;162(33):4391-4.
7
Local infiltration of epinephrine-containing lidocaine with bicarbonate reduces superficial bleeding and pain during labor epidural catheter insertion: a randomized trial.含肾上腺素利多卡因与碳酸氢钠局部浸润可减少分娩硬膜外导管置入时的浅表出血和疼痛:一项随机试验。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007 Apr;16(2):116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.09.006. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
8
Double-blind, bilateral pain comparison with simultaneous injection of 2% lidocaine versus buffered 2% lidocaine for periocular anesthesia.双眼、双侧疼痛比较,同时注射 2%利多卡因与缓冲 2%利多卡因用于眶周麻醉。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Oct;119(10):2048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.029. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
9
Prospective comparison between buffered 1% lidocaine-epinephrine and skin cooling in reducing the pain of local anesthetic infiltration.缓冲 1%利多卡因-肾上腺素与皮肤冷却在减轻局部麻醉浸润疼痛方面的前瞻性比较。
Dermatol Surg. 2012 Oct;38(10):1654-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02522.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
10
Use of buffered lidocaine in bone marrow biopsies: a randomized, controlled trial.缓冲利多卡因在骨髓活检中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Jan;36(1):52-60. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.52-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the Efficacy of 8.4% and 7.5% Buffered Lidocaine during Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar- A Split Mouth Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.比较8.4%和7.5% 缓冲利多卡因在拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙手术中的疗效——一项双侧对照双盲随机对照研究
J Dent (Shiraz). 2024 Sep 1;25(3):262-267. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2023.98891.2115. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Effect of Buffered Local Anesthesia on Perioperative Pain During Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.缓冲局部麻醉对动静脉内瘘手术围手术期疼痛的影响:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2021 May 23;13(5):e15202. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15202.
3
Buffered versus unbuffered local anesthesia for inferior alveolar nerve block injections in children: a systematic review.
儿童下牙槽神经阻滞注射中缓冲与非缓冲局部麻醉的系统评价
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Oct;20(5):271-279. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.5.271. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
4
A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Buffered Local Anesthetics in Infected and Inflamed Pulp and Periapical Tissues.一项评估缓冲局部麻醉剂在感染和炎症牙髓及根尖周组织中的疗效的前瞻性、随机双盲研究。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Jun;19(2):246-250. doi: 10.1007/s12663-019-01188-y. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
5
Comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study.三种局部麻醉剂对7至11岁儿童的疗效比较:一项随机临床研究。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Feb;20(1):29-37. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.1.29. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
6
Children's Pain Perception and Behavioral Feedback during Local Anesthetic Injection with Four Injection Site Preparation Methods.四种注射部位准备方法下儿童在局部麻醉注射期间的疼痛感知与行为反馈
Maedica (Bucur). 2019 Dec;14(4):343-349. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2019.14.4.343.
7
Determination of Onset of Action and Efficacy of Topical Lignocaine Anesthesia in Children: An Study.儿童局部利多卡因麻醉起效时间和疗效的测定:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 May-Jun;12(3):178-181. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1615.
8
Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of warm, buffered and conventional 2% lignocaine for the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in mandibular primary molars: A randomized controlled clinical trial.温热、缓冲及传统2%利多卡因在下颌乳磨牙下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)成功实施中的麻醉效果比较评估:一项随机对照临床试验
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018 Spring;12(2):102-109. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.016. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
9
The Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine Single Buccal Infiltration versus Conventional Buccal and Palatal Injection Using Lidocaine during Primary Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized Control Trial.阿替卡因和利多卡因单次颊侧浸润与利多卡因常规颊侧和腭侧注射在上颌乳磨牙拔除术中的有效性:一项随机对照试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):160-164. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186589.
10
The most painful site of maxillary anterior infiltrations.上颌前部浸润最疼痛的部位。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016 Nov-Dec;13(6):539-543. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.197030.