Hovell M F, Slymen D J, Jones J A, Hofstetter C R, Burkham-Kreitner S, Conway T L, Rubin B, Noel D
Center for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, CA 92182-0405, USA.
Am J Public Health. 1996 Dec;86(12):1760-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.12.1760.
This study examined the effect of an orthodontist-delivered tobacco-use prevention program for adolescents.
Southern California orthodontic offices were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 77) and control (n = 77) groups. Randomly selected adolescents were interviewed at baseline and 2 years later (n = 15,644). Experimental offices received tobacco prevention training, anti-tobacco materials, and 50 cents for each anti-tobacco "prescription" written.
The 30-day tobacco use 2-year incidence rates for the control and experimental groups were 12.6% and 12.0%, respectively; incidence rates for using tobacco more than 100 times were 7.6% and 6.8%. Differences between the groups did not reach significance. Mean prescription compliance was 64.4%. A multivariate logistic model, showed a significant dose response: patients who received more prescriptions had lower incidence rates than those who received few or none (10% vs 14%).
Training, payment, and support did not ensure clinician compliance with prevention services. The dose effect suggests that replication under conditions that would ensure clinician compliance and statistical power would more thoroughly test clinicians' ability to prevent tobacco use.
本研究探讨了由正畸医生提供的青少年烟草使用预防项目的效果。
南加州的正畸诊所被随机分为实验组(n = 77)和对照组(n = 77)。在基线时和2年后对随机选取的青少年进行访谈(n = 15,644)。实验组诊所接受了烟草预防培训、反烟草资料,并且每开出一份反烟草“处方”可获得50美分。
对照组和实验组的30天烟草使用2年发病率分别为12.6%和12.0%;使用烟草超过100次的发病率分别为7.6%和6.8%。两组之间的差异未达到显著水平。平均处方依从率为64.4%。一个多变量逻辑模型显示出显著的剂量反应:接受更多处方的患者发病率低于接受较少或未接受处方的患者(10%对14%)。
培训、报酬和支持并不能确保临床医生遵守预防服务。剂量效应表明,在能够确保临床医生遵守规定且具备统计学效力的条件下进行重复研究,将能更全面地检验临床医生预防烟草使用的能力。