Stephan H, Mielck F, Hoeft A, Scholz M, Buhre W, Lausch K, Sonntag H
Zentrum Anaesthesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivemedizin, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.
Anaesthesist. 1996 Nov;45(11):1030-6. doi: 10.1007/s001010050336.
In this study cerebral blood flow (CBF) was simultaneously measured with the Kety-Schmidt method and the intravenous 133Xe clearance technique. CBF, cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2), and CO2 reactivity of CBF were compared under fentanyl-midazolam anaesthesia and varying paCO2 levels.
Thirteen male patients were studied before they underwent coronary artery bypass surgery. For measurement of CBF with the Kety-Schmidt inert gas saturation technique, argon was used as indicator instead of nitrous oxide, because argon is less soluble in water and lipid such that arterial and hence organ saturation is attained earlier. Wash-in periods of 10 min were used for all measurements. For measurement of CBF with the intravenous xenon method 10 scintillation detectors placed lateral to the skull and an air detector for calculation of tracer recirculation were used. 10-15 mCi of 133Xe dissolved in physiological saline was injected via a peripheral i.v. cannula. For comparison with the Kety-Schmidt technique CBF15-values representing the flow of the grey and white matter were chosen. CBF was measured simultaneously with both methods under normocapnic (paCO2 43 +/- 3 mmHg), hypocapnic (paCO2 31 +/- 3 mmHg), and under hypercapnic (paCO2 54 +/- 4 mmHg) conditions.
All CBF15 values obtained with the intravenous xenon method were significantly lower than the corresponding CBF-values measured with the Kety-Schmidt technique: by 36% under normocapnic, 23% under hypocapnic, and 39% under hypercapnic conditions, respectively. Hence, CMRO2 values calculated from CBF values obtained with the xenon method were reduced to about the same degree as those derived from CBF values measured with the Kety-Schmidt technique. There was no significant correlation between the CBF values of either method (y = 1.82x-8.58,r = 0.76 P = 0.357). Non-linear curve-fitting procedures yielded exponential CBF-paCO2 relationships for both methods, although the relative carbon dioxide reactivity was higher with the Kety-Schmidt technique than with the xenon method (y = 8.14 e0.039x vs y = 10,75 e0.023x).
Most probably due to contamination with radioactivity from slowly perfused extracerebral tissues the intravenous 133Xe-clearance technique underestimates CBF, CMRO2, and cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity, at least when CBF15 values are used as flow parameters.
在本研究中,采用凯蒂 - 施密特法和静脉注射133Xe清除技术同时测量脑血流量(CBF)。在芬太尼 - 咪达唑仑麻醉和不同的动脉血二氧化碳分压(paCO2)水平下,比较了CBF、脑氧代谢率(CMRO2)和CBF的二氧化碳反应性。
对13名男性患者在接受冠状动脉搭桥手术前进行了研究。在用凯蒂 - 施密特惰性气体饱和技术测量CBF时,使用氩气代替一氧化二氮作为指示剂,因为氩气在水和脂质中的溶解度较低,从而能更早地达到动脉及器官饱和度。所有测量均采用10分钟的洗入期。在用静脉注射氙气法测量CBF时,使用10个置于颅骨外侧的闪烁探测器和1个用于计算示踪剂再循环的空气探测器。将10 - 15毫居里溶解于生理盐水中的133Xe通过外周静脉插管注入。为了与凯蒂 - 施密特技术进行比较,选择了代表灰质和白质血流量的CBF15值。在正常碳酸血症(paCO2 43±3 mmHg)、低碳酸血症(paCO2 31±3 mmHg)和高碳酸血症(paCO2 54±4 mmHg)条件下,同时用两种方法测量CBF。
静脉注射氙气法获得的所有CBF15值均显著低于用凯蒂 - 施密特技术测量的相应CBF值:在正常碳酸血症条件下低36%,在低碳酸血症条件下低23%,在高碳酸血症条件下低39%。因此,根据氙气法获得的CBF值计算出的CMRO2值降低的程度与根据凯蒂 - 施密特技术测量的CBF值计算出的CMRO2值降低的程度大致相同。两种方法的CBF值之间无显著相关性(y = 1.82x - 8.58,r = 0.76,P = 0.357)。非线性曲线拟合程序得出两种方法的CBF - paCO2关系均为指数关系,尽管凯蒂 - 施密特技术的相对二氧化碳反应性高于氙气法(y = 8.14 e0.039x对比y = 10.75 e0.023x)。
静脉注射133Xe清除技术很可能由于受灌注缓慢的脑外组织放射性污染,至少在将CBF15值用作血流参数时,会低估CBF、CMRO2和脑血管二氧化碳反应性。