Suppr超能文献

连续腘部坐骨神经阻滞:一种足部手术后提供术后镇痛的原创技术。

Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block: an original technique to provide postoperative analgesia after foot surgery.

作者信息

Singelyn F J, Aye F, Gouverneur J M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, UCL School of Medicine, St Luc Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1997 Feb;84(2):383-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199702000-00027.

Abstract

Our study describes an original technique of continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block (CPSB) (Group A, 60 patients) and compares its analgesic efficacy after foot surgery with intramuscular (IM) opioids (Group B, 15 patients) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine (Group C, 45 patients). CPSB was performed using Singelyn's landmarks. The sciatic nerve was localized with a short-beveled needle connected to a peripheral nerve stimulator. A 20-gauge catheter was placed at the same depth as the needle with a Seldinger technique. Thirty milliliters of 1% mepivacaine with epinephrine 1/200,000 was injected and followed by a continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil 0.1 microgram/mL and clonidine 1 microgram/mL at 7 mL/h for 48 h. Postoperative analgesia (intravenous [IV] propacetamol [PRO] and/or IM piritramide [DIPI]) was standardized. Postoperative pain score (PPS), supplemental analgesia, and side effects were noted. CPSB was easy to perform in 55 patients (92%). In Group A, highest and mean PPS were significantly lower, and the mean dose of PRO was reduced by 62% and 36% when compared with Group B and C, respectively. Only 8% of patients required postoperative opioid in Group A compared with 91% and 100% in Groups B and C, respectively. No immediate or delayed complications other than postoperative technical problems (kinked or broken catheter 25%) were noted in Group A. In conclusion, CPSB is easy to perform, safe, and a more efficient technique than parenteral opioid for providing postoperative analgesia after foot surgery.

摘要

我们的研究描述了一种连续腘部坐骨神经阻滞(CPSB)的原创技术(A组,60例患者),并将足部手术后其镇痛效果与肌内注射(IM)阿片类药物(B组,15例患者)以及静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA)使用吗啡(C组,45例患者)进行比较。CPSB采用辛格林的体表标志进行操作。使用连接外周神经刺激器的短斜面针定位坐骨神经。采用塞丁格技术将一根20G导管置于与针相同的深度。注入30毫升含肾上腺素1/200,000的1%甲哌卡因,随后以7毫升/小时的速度持续输注含舒芬太尼0.1微克/毫升和可乐定1微克/毫升的0.125%布比卡因,持续48小时。术后镇痛(静脉注射[IV]丙帕他莫[PRO]和/或肌内注射匹利卡明[DIPI])进行标准化。记录术后疼痛评分(PPS)、补充镇痛及副作用。CPSB在55例患者(92%)中操作容易。与B组和C组相比,A组的最高和平均PPS显著更低,PRO的平均剂量分别减少了62%和36%。A组仅8%的患者术后需要使用阿片类药物,而B组和C组分别为91%和100%。A组除术后技术问题(导管扭结或折断25%)外,未发现即刻或延迟并发症。总之,CPSB操作容易、安全,且在足部手术后提供术后镇痛方面比胃肠外阿片类药物是一种更有效的技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验