Nava S, Bruschi C, Fracchia C, Braschi A, Rubini F
Pneumology Division of Centro Medico di Riabilitazione di Montescano, Fondazione Clinica del Lavoro IRCCS, Italy.
Eur Respir J. 1997 Jan;10(1):177-83. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10010177.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pressure support ventilation (PSV) requires different diaphragmatic efforts and patient-ventilator matching, according to the underlying disease. Four groups of patients requiring PSV were studied: Group A, recovering from an episode of acute respiratory failure due to adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); Group B, with postsurgical complications; and two subsets of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, with "normal" static compliance of the respiratory system (Cst,rs) (Group C) or elevated Cst,rs (Group D). Ventilatory pattern, transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), the pressure-time product of the diaphragm (PTPdi), static (PEEPi,stat) and dynamic intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi,dyn), Cst,rs and resistance of the total respiratory system (Rrs) were recorded. The matching between patient and ventilator was analysed, recording the number of "ineffective efforts" (inspiratory efforts not efficient enough to trigger a new ventilator cycle, despite a positive deflection in Pdi). A satisfactory blood gas equilibrium arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2 > 93%, with a pH > 7.32) was obtained in the various groups with different levels of PSV. Minute ventilation was found to be significantly higher in Groups A and B, due to the longer expiratory time (tE) in the COPD groups. Group A (2 out of 7), Group B (3 out of 7), Group C (3 out of 5) patients showed sporadic "ineffective efforts". All Group D patients manifested continuous mismatching with the ventilator, so that the pressure-time product of the diaphragm per minute (PTPdi/min), reflecting the metabolic work of the diaphragm, was not different in the four groups. Tidal volume and the spontaneous inspiratory efforts were similar in the four groups, but the number of breaths delivered by the ventilator was significantly higher in Groups A and B. The application of different levels of pressure support ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure due to different pathologies, led them to breathe with comparable pressure time product of the diaphragm. The majority of the patients showed mismatching with the ventilator, although this effect was more pronounced in the groups with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
本研究的目的是评估压力支持通气(PSV)是否因基础疾病的不同而需要不同的膈肌做功及患者与呼吸机的匹配情况。对四组需要PSV的患者进行了研究:A组,因成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)导致急性呼吸衰竭发作后正在恢复;B组,有术后并发症;以及慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的两个亚组,其中一组呼吸系统静态顺应性(Cst,rs)“正常”(C组),另一组Cst,rs升高(D组)。记录通气模式、跨膈压(Pdi)、膈肌压力 - 时间乘积(PTPdi)、静态内源性呼气末正压(PEEPi,stat)和动态内源性呼气末正压(PEEPi,dyn)、Cst,rs以及总呼吸系统阻力(Rrs)。分析患者与呼吸机的匹配情况,记录“无效努力”的次数(吸气努力虽使Pdi出现正向偏移,但效率不足以触发新的呼吸机周期)。在不同水平的PSV下,各研究组均获得了满意的血气平衡(动脉血氧饱和度(Sa,O2 > 93%,pH > 7.32))。发现A组和B组的分钟通气量显著更高,这是由于COPD组的呼气时间(tE)更长。A组(7例中的2例)、B组(7例中的3例)、C组(5例中的3例)患者出现了偶发的“无效努力”。所有D组患者均表现出与呼吸机持续不匹配,因此反映膈肌代谢做功的每分钟膈肌压力 - 时间乘积(PTPdi/min)在四组中并无差异。四组的潮气量和自主吸气努力相似,但A组和B组中呼吸机输送的呼吸次数显著更高。对因不同病理导致急性呼吸衰竭的患者应用不同水平的压力支持通气,使他们以可比的膈肌压力 - 时间乘积进行呼吸。大多数患者表现出与呼吸机不匹配,尽管这种效应在慢性阻塞性肺疾病组中更为明显。