Daniels K R, Lewis G M, Curson R
Department of Social Work, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):673-80. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00220-1.
The authors report on a comparative questionnaire study of semen donors at two London clinics offering donor insemination (DI). Results presented here include donors' attitudes towards the storage of identifying information on the UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's central register, the importance of anonymity when donating, feelings about being traced by DI offspring, and views on the release of identifying donor information to mature offspring. Donors from the two clinics were found to differ on some, although not all, of the above points; in particular, donors from one clinic offered more support for the eventual release of identifying information to DI offspring. The discussion brings in the results of other studies and highlights the complexity of the anonymity question. The authors conclude that some donors may be willing to move towards greater openness of information under controlled conditions using the existing central register and a "veto" system.
作者报告了一项针对伦敦两家提供供精人工授精(DI)诊所的精液捐赠者的比较问卷调查研究。此处呈现的结果包括捐赠者对在英国人类受精与胚胎学管理局中央登记处存储身份识别信息的态度、捐赠时匿名的重要性、对被DI后代追踪的感受,以及对向成年后代披露捐赠者身份识别信息的看法。发现两家诊所的捐赠者在上述部分(而非全部)观点上存在差异;特别是,一家诊所的捐赠者对最终向DI后代披露身份识别信息给予了更多支持。讨论引入了其他研究的结果,并突出了匿名问题的复杂性。作者得出结论,一些捐赠者可能愿意在使用现有中央登记处和“否决”系统的可控条件下,朝着更大程度的信息公开迈进。