Gupta L, Ward J E, Hayward R S
Central Sydney Area Health Service, Needs Assessment & Health Outcomes Unit, NSW.
Med J Aust. 1997 Jan 20;166(2):69-72. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb138723.x.
To determine Australian general practitioners' (GPs') views about and recall of clinical practice guidelines.
Self-administered questionnaire survey.
Randomly selected Australian GPs.
286 of 373 GPs returned questionnaires (77% response rate). GPs' recall of each of nine guidelines ranged from 52% to 94%; 49% considered that their practice had changed as a result of a guideline. While 92% of respondents agreed that guidelines were "good educational tools", 85% indicated that guidelines were "developed by experts who don't understand general practice". Factors most frequently identified as important in deciding whether to follow the guideline recommendations were whether the guideline was based on evidence and credible endorsement.
Australian GPs have positive views about the purpose of clinical practice guidelines and an evidence-based approach to guidelines development. However, respondents rating of the perceived impact of available guidelines in everyday practice was low. The dissemination of specific guidelines is patchy and there is little evidence of systematic implementation.
确定澳大利亚全科医生(GPs)对临床实践指南的看法及记忆情况。
自填式问卷调查。
随机选取的澳大利亚全科医生。
373名全科医生中有286人返回问卷(回复率77%)。全科医生对九条指南中每条的记忆率在52%至94%之间;49%的人认为他们的执业行为因某条指南而发生了改变。虽然92%的受访者同意指南是“良好的教育工具”,但85%的人表示指南是“由不了解全科医疗的专家制定的”。在决定是否遵循指南建议时,最常被认为重要的因素是该指南是否基于证据以及是否有可靠的认可。
澳大利亚全科医生对临床实践指南的目的以及基于证据的指南制定方法持积极看法。然而,受访者对现有指南在日常实践中感知到的影响评价较低。特定指南的传播并不均衡,几乎没有系统实施的证据。