Lytton W W, Destexhe A, Sejnowski T J
Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706, USA.
Neuroscience. 1996 Feb;70(3):673-84. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)83006-5.
We investigated computer models of a single thalamocortical neuron to assess the interaction of intrinsic voltage-sensitive channels and cortical synaptic input in producing the range of oscillation frequencies observed in these cells in vivo. A morphologically detailed model with Hodgkin-Huxley-like ion channels demonstrated that intrinsic properties would be sufficient to readily produce 3 to 6 Hz oscillations. Hyperpolarization of the model cell reduced its oscillation frequency monotonically whether through current injection or modulation of a potassium conductance, simulating the response to a neuromodulatory input. We performed detailed analysis of highly reduced models to determine the mechanism of this frequency control. The interburst interval was controlled by two different mechanisms depending on whether or not the pacemaker current, IH, was present. In the absence of IH, depolarization during the interburst interval occurred at the same rate with different current injections. The voltage difference from the nadir to threshold for the low-threshold calcium current, IT, determined the interburst interval. In contrast, with IH present, the rate of depolarization depended on injected current. With the full model, simulated repetitive cortical synaptic input entrained oscillations up to approximately double the natural frequency. Cortical input readily produced phase resetting as well. Our findings suggest that neither ascending brainstem control altering underlying hyperpolarization, nor descending drive by repetitive cortical inputs, would alone be sufficient to produce the range of oscillation frequencies seen in thalamocortical neurons. Instead, intrinsic neuronal mechanisms would dominate for generating the delta range (0.5-4 Hz) oscillations seen during slow wave sleep, whereas synaptic interactions with cortex and the thalamic reticular nucleus would be required for faster oscillations in the frequency range of spindling (7-14 Hz).
我们研究了单个丘脑皮质神经元的计算机模型,以评估内在电压敏感通道与皮质突触输入在产生这些细胞在体内观察到的振荡频率范围时的相互作用。一个具有类似霍奇金-赫胥黎离子通道的形态学详细模型表明,内在特性足以轻易产生3至6赫兹的振荡。无论是通过电流注入还是钾电导调制来模拟对神经调节输入的反应,模型细胞的超极化都会单调降低其振荡频率。我们对高度简化的模型进行了详细分析,以确定这种频率控制的机制。爆发间隔由两种不同机制控制,这取决于起搏器电流IH是否存在。在没有IH的情况下,不同电流注入时爆发间隔期间的去极化以相同速率发生。低阈值钙电流IT从最低点到阈值的电压差决定了爆发间隔。相比之下,在存在IH的情况下,去极化速率取决于注入电流。使用完整模型,模拟的重复性皮质突触输入会使振荡频率夹带至自然频率的约两倍。皮质输入也很容易产生相位重置。我们的研究结果表明,无论是改变潜在超极化的上行脑干控制,还是重复性皮质输入的下行驱动,单独都不足以产生丘脑皮质神经元中观察到的振荡频率范围。相反,内在神经元机制在产生慢波睡眠期间出现的δ范围(0.5 - 4赫兹)振荡中占主导地位,而在纺锤波(7 - 14赫兹)频率范围内更快的振荡则需要与皮质和丘脑网状核的突触相互作用。