Baglin T, Luddington R
Department of Haematology, Addenbrooke's NHS Trust, Cambridge.
Br J Haematol. 1997 Mar;96(3):431-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.d01-2079.x.
In order to develop decentralized anticoagulant care by off-site blood sampling and transport of samples to a centralized laboratory for International Normalized Ratio (INR) determination we have performed a direct comparative study of INR stability. Analysis was performed daily for 5 d using nine thromboplastins. The overall mean difference of INR after 3d was only 0.05 INR units for samples with a therapeutic INR. After 5 d there was a mean difference of 0.11 INR units with 'non-Manchester' reagents and 0.44 INR units with 'Manchester' reagents. With over-anticoagulated samples mean differences of 0.55-0.72 INR units were observed after 3 d and 1.16-2.46 INR units after 5 d. Although there was some variation in stability of results with different thromboplastins, the difference over time with each thromboplastin was much less than the difference between thromboplastins. In conclusion, there is no clinically significant change in INR when analysis is delayed for up to 3 d. Off-site blood sampling can accommodate a large increase in patient workload without a major revenue increase in primary care and with continued total quality management and central expert advice.
为了通过现场外采血并将样本运至中央实验室以测定国际标准化比值(INR)来开展分散式抗凝护理,我们进行了一项INR稳定性的直接对比研究。使用9种凝血活酶,每天进行分析,持续5天。对于治疗性INR的样本,3天后INR的总体平均差异仅为0.05 INR单位。5天后,使用“非曼彻斯特”试剂的平均差异为0.11 INR单位,使用“曼彻斯特”试剂的平均差异为0.44 INR单位。对于抗凝过度的样本,3天后观察到的平均差异为0.55 - 0.72 INR单位,5天后为1.16 - 2.46 INR单位。尽管不同凝血活酶的结果稳定性存在一些差异,但每种凝血活酶随时间的差异远小于凝血活酶之间的差异。总之,当分析延迟长达3天时,INR没有临床显著变化。现场外采血可以在初级护理中大幅增加患者工作量,而无需大幅增加收入,同时持续进行全面质量管理并接受中央专家建议。