Cripe L D
Indiana University School of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Indiana University Hospital, Indianapolis, USA.
Curr Probl Cancer. 1997 Jan-Feb;21(1):1-64. doi: 10.1016/s0147-0272(97)80006-2.
Untreated acute leukemia is a uniformly fatal disease with a median survival time shorter than 3 months. Current treatment strategies provide a significant increase in survival time for most patients, some of whom may be cured. The majority of patients with acute leukemia, however, ultimately die of the disease or complications of treatment. The effective treatment of acute leukemia requires (1) differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) from acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and recognition of clinically relevant subtypes; (2) identification of patients who are more likely or less likely than average to benefit from a conventional treatment; and (3) selection of therapy that provides a reasonable likelihood of response with acceptable risk of toxic effects. The diagnosis of acute leukemia is established in most cases by a bone marrow aspirate that demonstrates at least 30% blast cells. The traditional criteria to distinguish between AML and ALL rely on morphology and cytochemical reactions. Immunologic analysis of antigen expression and analysis for numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities of leukemia cells are routinely feasible. Karyotypic analysis is of prognostic importance and should be performed on all diagnostic specimens of bone marrow aspirate. Immunophenotypic analysis may be useful to confirm the disease classification in selected cases. The importance of the routine immunophenotypic characterization of acute leukemia, however, is controversial. The subtypes that must be recognized because of the need for specific treatment include (a) acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), which is the M3 subtype of AML, and (b) the L3 subtype or mature B-cell ALL. Induction therapy for acute leukemia is treatment intended to achieve induction of complete remission (CR). Complete remission is defined as the absence of morphologic evidence of leukemia after recovery of the peripheral blood cell counts. Failure to achieve CR may be attributed to death during chemotherapy-induced bone marrow hypoplasia or to drug resistance manifested either as failure to achieve hypoplasia or as persistent leukemia after recovery from hypoplasia. Postremission therapy is treatment administered in CR to prevent or delay relapse of the leukemia. However, the majority of patients have disease relapse. Intensification of therapy is a treatment strategy designed to overcome resistance to chemotherapy. Recent clinical trials of intensified induction or postremission therapy suggest improved outcome. However, the toxic effects of dose intensification can be substantial, limiting any potential benefit of this approach. Identification of prognostic factors may allow one to estimate the likelihood of an outcome, to determine an optimal treatment strategy. It is well established that age at the time of diagnosis, leukemia cell karyotype, and whether the leukemia is de novo or secondary are factors that influence treatment decisions. Patients with favorable prognostic factors should probably receive conventional therapy. Patients with unfavorable prognostic factors have shown little benefit from conventional therapy. In addition, factors that indicate poor outcome with conventional therapy are also predictive of poor outcome with intensified therapy. Consequently, these patients should be considered for investigational therapeutic strategies. The bias may be to counsel them to accept the potential increased morbidity of such treatment before there is definite evidence of the possibility of improved outcome. Induction chemotherapy for younger patients with AML (less than 55 years of age) in general consists of one or more courses of cytarabine (ara-C) and an anthracycline or an anthracycline derivative. Randomized trials have failed to confirm that treatment with either etoposide or high-dose ara-C induces disease remission. Patients with secondary AML, high levels of CD34 antigen expression, or an unfavorable karyotype, however, may benefit from ind
未经治疗的急性白血病是一种必死无疑的疾病,中位生存时间短于3个月。目前的治疗策略显著延长了大多数患者的生存时间,其中一些患者可能被治愈。然而,大多数急性白血病患者最终死于该疾病或治疗并发症。急性白血病的有效治疗需要:(1)区分急性髓系白血病(AML)和急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL),并识别临床相关亚型;(2)确定比一般患者更有可能或更不可能从传统治疗中获益的患者;(3)选择一种有合理反应可能性且毒副作用风险可接受的治疗方法。大多数情况下,急性白血病的诊断通过骨髓穿刺确定,骨髓穿刺显示至少30%的原始细胞。区分AML和ALL的传统标准依赖于形态学和细胞化学反应。白血病细胞抗原表达的免疫分析以及白血病细胞数量或结构染色体异常的分析通常是可行的。核型分析具有预后重要性,应对所有骨髓穿刺诊断标本进行该分析。免疫表型分析在某些选定病例中可能有助于确认疾病分类。然而,急性白血病常规免疫表型特征的重要性存在争议。由于需要特定治疗而必须识别的亚型包括:(a)急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL),即AML的M3亚型,以及(b)L3亚型或成熟B细胞ALL。急性白血病的诱导治疗旨在实现完全缓解(CR)的诱导。完全缓解定义为外周血细胞计数恢复后无白血病的形态学证据。未能实现CR可能归因于化疗诱导的骨髓发育不全期间的死亡,或表现为未能实现发育不全或从发育不全恢复后白血病持续存在的耐药性。缓解后治疗是在CR状态下进行的治疗,以预防或延迟白血病复发。然而,大多数患者会出现疾病复发。强化治疗是一种旨在克服化疗耐药性的治疗策略。近期强化诱导或缓解后治疗的临床试验表明预后有所改善。然而,剂量强化的毒副作用可能很大,限制了这种方法的任何潜在益处。识别预后因素可以让人们估计结果的可能性,确定最佳治疗策略。众所周知,诊断时的年龄、白血病细胞核型以及白血病是原发性还是继发性是影响治疗决策的因素。具有有利预后因素的患者可能应接受传统治疗。具有不利预后因素的患者从传统治疗中获益甚微。此外,表明传统治疗预后不良的因素也预示着强化治疗预后不良。因此,应考虑这些患者采用研究性治疗策略。可能的倾向是在有明确证据表明有可能改善预后之前,建议他们接受这种治疗潜在增加的发病率。一般来说,年龄小于55岁的年轻AML患者的诱导化疗由一个或多个阿糖胞苷(ara-C)疗程和一种蒽环类药物或蒽环类衍生物组成。随机试验未能证实依托泊苷或大剂量ara-C治疗可诱导疾病缓解。然而,继发性AML、CD34抗原表达水平高或核型不利的患者可能从诱导……中获益