Cronqvist A, Klang B, Björvell H
Centre of Caring Sciences North, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Qual Life Res. 1997 Jan;6(1):87-96. doi: 10.1023/a:1026425730325.
This paper presents Swedish reference values for the Jalowiec Coping Scale (JCS-60), a questionnaire measuring the use and efficacy of coping strategies. The strategies are grouped in eight coping styles. The sample used was randomly selected from a Swedish urban population. The sample consisted of 268 individuals (135 men and 133 women), divided into three age-groups, 26-40, 41-55 and 56-70 years. There were no significant differences between the three age-groups or between men and women when comparing the total scores for use and efficacy on the JCS-60. No significant differences were found between the genders within each age-group. The most commonly used coping styles were the confrontational, the optimistic and the self-reliant. The least used style was the fatalistic. Men, as compared with women, used the confrontational and self-reliant coping styles more while women used the supportive coping style more than men. The youngest age-group used the emotive coping style more, compared with the other age groups. Cronbach's alpha for the total scores indicates acceptable reliability. The results of this study may be useful as Swedish reference values for comparison with the research results of studies on patients.
本文介绍了Jalowiec应对量表(JCS - 60)的瑞典参考值,该量表是一种用于测量应对策略的使用情况和效果的问卷。这些策略被分为八种应对方式。所使用的样本是从瑞典城市人口中随机抽取的。样本由268人组成(135名男性和133名女性),分为三个年龄组,分别是26 - 40岁、41 - 55岁和56 - 70岁。在比较JCS - 60使用情况和效果的总分时,三个年龄组之间以及男性和女性之间均无显著差异。在每个年龄组内,未发现性别之间存在显著差异。最常用的应对方式是对抗性、乐观性和自力更生型。最少使用的方式是宿命论型。与女性相比,男性更多地使用对抗性和自力更生型应对方式,而女性比男性更多地使用支持性应对方式。与其他年龄组相比,最年轻的年龄组更多地使用情感应对方式。总分的Cronbach's alpha表明可靠性可接受。本研究结果作为瑞典参考值,可能有助于与患者研究的结果进行比较。