Suppr超能文献

1973 - 1990年瑞典结肠癌患者的生存率。集水区之间的趋同情况。

Survival after colon cancer 1973-1990 in Sweden. Convergence between catchment areas.

作者信息

Blomqvist P, Ekbom A, Nyrén O, Krusemo U, Bergström R, Adami H O

机构信息

Department of Cancer Epidemiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1997 Feb;225(2):208-16. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199702000-00009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to analyze the temporal trends in relative survival among patients with colon cancer in catchment areas of hospitals of different categories and regions in Sweden.

BACKGROUND

In Sweden, cancer of the colon is the second most common type of cancer in women and the third most common in men, afflicting approximately 3000 individuals annually. During the past decades, survival has improved, but it is not clear what factors have contributed to this development. Changes in the natural history of the disease, altered alimentary habits, advances in diagnosis, and treatment have been suggested. The effects of centralized care still are debated.

METHOD

Longitudinal observational study of relative survival of all patients with colon cancer from 1973 to 1993 in Sweden (n = 41,700) by period of diagnosis and hospital category of primary catchment area was conducted. Multivariate analyses of relative hazards of any interaction between length of follow-up, period of diagnosis, hospital category of the primary catchment area, age at diagnosis, and region were performed.

RESULTS

Relative survival in patients with colon cancer improved substantially from 1973 through 1990. The prognosis in patients from primary catchment areas of regional-university hospitals did not change during this period, and the prognostic improvement was noted only in county and local hospital areas, where survival approached that of regional hospitals. Although new management regimens may have been introduced unevenly, improved perioperative care best explains this convergence. Low-incidence regions showed the lowest survival, but this improved with time, although not significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Although survival in patients with colon cancer improved and convergence between different catchment area categories was seen, a large initial gap as well as a remaining difference may warrant future monitoring to ensure equal prognosis, irrespective of domicile.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析瑞典不同类别和地区医院服务区域内结肠癌患者的相对生存率随时间的变化趋势。

背景

在瑞典,结肠癌是女性中第二常见的癌症类型,男性中第三常见,每年约有3000人患病。在过去几十年中,生存率有所提高,但尚不清楚哪些因素促成了这一发展。有人提出疾病自然史的变化、饮食习惯的改变、诊断和治疗的进步等因素。集中护理的效果仍存在争议。

方法

对1973年至1993年瑞典所有结肠癌患者(n = 41,700)按诊断时期和主要服务区域的医院类别进行相对生存率的纵向观察研究。对随访时间、诊断时期、主要服务区域的医院类别、诊断时年龄和地区之间的任何相互作用的相对风险进行多变量分析。

结果

1973年至1990年期间,结肠癌患者的相对生存率显著提高。在此期间,区域大学医院主要服务区域的患者预后没有变化,仅在县和地方医院区域观察到预后改善,其生存率接近区域医院。尽管新的管理方案引入可能不均衡,但围手术期护理的改善最能解释这种趋同现象。低发病率地区的生存率最低,但随着时间推移有所改善,尽管改善不显著。

结论

尽管结肠癌患者的生存率有所提高,且不同服务区域类别之间出现了趋同现象,但最初的巨大差距以及仍然存在的差异可能需要未来进行监测,以确保无论居住地点如何,预后都能平等。

相似文献

1
Survival after colon cancer 1973-1990 in Sweden. Convergence between catchment areas.
Ann Surg. 1997 Feb;225(2):208-16. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199702000-00009.
3
Improved survival in cancer of the colon and rectum in Sweden.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Oct;31(8):845-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.05.002.
4
Distance to hospital is not a risk factor for emergency colon cancer surgery.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;33(9):1195-1200. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3074-y. Epub 2018 May 24.
6
Improved survival after an educational project on colon cancer management in the county of Stockholm--a population based cohort study.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;41(11):1479-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
7
Improved survival of patients with cancers of the colon and rectum?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Jun 15;80(8):586-91. doi: 10.1093/jnci/80.8.586.
9
Association of Radial Margin Positivity With Colon Cancer.
JAMA Surg. 2015 Sep;150(9):890-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1525.

引用本文的文献

1
Net survival of patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison of two periods.
Updates Surg. 2019 Dec;71(4):687-694. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00662-z. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
2
Survival, surgical management and perioperative mortality of colorectal cancer in the 21-year experience of a specialised registry.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jul;24(7):777-88. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0687-1. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
3
Anastomotic leaks after anterior resection for mid and low rectal cancer: survey of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery.
Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Jun;12(2):103-10. doi: 10.1007/s10151-008-0407-9. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
4
Hazard regression model and cure rate model in colon cancer relative survival trends: are they telling the same story?
Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(4):251-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-008-9226-6. Epub 2008 Feb 9.
5
Survival in stomach cancer is improving: results of a nationwide population-based Swedish study.
Ann Surg. 1999 Aug;230(2):162-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199908000-00005.

本文引用的文献

1
The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology.
Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1961 Sep;6:101-21.
2
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival.
J Chronic Dis. 1958 Dec;8(6):699-712. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7.
4
Outcome in colorectal adenocarcinoma: two seven-year studies of a population.
BMJ. 1993 Sep 18;307(6906):707-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6906.707.
6
Centralised treatment, entry to trials and survival.
Br J Cancer. 1994 Aug;70(2):352-62. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.306.
7
Variation in outcome of surgical procedures.
Br J Surg. 1994 May;81(5):653-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810508.
8
Temporal patterns in colorectal cancer incidence, survival, and mortality from 1950 through 1990.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Jul 6;86(13):997-1006. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.13.997.
9
Recent cancer trends in the United States.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Feb 1;87(3):175-82. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.3.175.
10
A computer program package for relative survival analysis.
Comput Programs Biomed. 1985;19(2-3):197-207. doi: 10.1016/0010-468x(85)90011-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验