• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

GRBAS量表的重测研究:经验和专业背景对嗓音质量感知评分的影响

Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality.

作者信息

De Bodt M S, Wuyts F L, Van de Heyning P H, Croux C

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Belgium.

出版信息

J Voice. 1997 Mar;11(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80026-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80026-4
PMID:9075179
Abstract

Perceptual evaluation was performed by means of the GRBAS scale for a series of nine pathological voice samples that were presented twice to a group of 23 judges, consisting of experienced and inexperienced otolaryngologists (ENTs) and speech-language pathologists (S/LPs). The time interval between ratings was 14 days. Test-retest reliability was moderate. The best agreement between the observers was obtained for the G (grade) parameter and the worst for the S (strained) parameter. Considering the medians of the GRBAS ratings, no significant influence was measured for level of experience or professional background. Yet, based on means, the results show that professional background has a greater impact on perceptual rating than experience.

摘要

通过GRBAS量表对一系列九个病理性嗓音样本进行了感知评估,这些样本向由经验丰富和经验不足的耳鼻喉科医生(ENTs)和言语语言病理学家(S/LPs)组成的23名评判员展示了两次。评分之间的时间间隔为14天。重测信度为中等。观察者之间在G(等级)参数上的一致性最好,在S(紧张)参数上的一致性最差。考虑到GRBAS评分的中位数,未发现经验水平或专业背景有显著影响。然而,基于平均值,结果表明专业背景对感知评分的影响大于经验。

相似文献

1
Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality.GRBAS量表的重测研究:经验和专业背景对嗓音质量感知评分的影响
J Voice. 1997 Mar;11(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80026-4.
2
The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.听众体验在甲状腺切除术后嗓音的共识性听觉感知评估(CAPE-V)评分中的作用。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Aug;19(3):248-58. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0012). Epub 2010 May 19.
3
A comparison of voice quality ratings made by Japanese and American listeners using the GRBAS scale.日本听众和美国听众使用GRBAS量表进行的嗓音质量评分比较。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2003 May-Jun;55(3):147-57. doi: 10.1159/000070726.
4
Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia: A Comparison Between Narrow and Broad Terminology Systems.嗓音障碍的听觉感知评估:狭义与广义术语系统的比较
J Voice. 2018 Jul;32(4):428-436. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
5
Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.感知语音评估中的言语任务与评分者间信度
J Voice. 2014 Nov;28(6):725-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 May 17.
6
The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.母语对巴西和加拿大语言病理学家完成的语音样本听觉感知评估的影响。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):258.e1-258.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
7
Audio-perceptual evaluation of Portuguese voice disorders-an inter- and intrajudge reliability study.葡萄牙语语音障碍的听感知评估——一项跨和内评判者可靠性研究。
J Voice. 2014 Mar;28(2):210-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
8
Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders.基于临床医生(GRBAS 和 CAPE-V)及基于患者(V-RQOL 和 IPVI)的嗓音障碍记录的可靠性。
J Voice. 2007 Sep;21(5):576-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.05.001. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
9
Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Disorder in Children Who Have Had Laryngotracheal Reconstruction Surgery and the Relationship Between Clinician Perceptual Ratingof Voice Quality and Parent Proxy/Child Self-Report of Voice-Related Quality of Life.儿童喉气管重建术后嗓音障碍的感知评估及临床医生对嗓音质量的感知评估与父母/儿童嗓音相关生活质量自评之间的关系。
J Voice. 2019 Nov;33(6):945.e27-945.e35. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
10
Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality of Cochlear-implanted and Normal-hearing Individuals: A Reliability Study.人工耳蜗植入者和正常听力者语音质量的听觉感知评估:一项可靠性研究。
J Voice. 2017 Nov;31(6):774.e1-774.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Acoustic Metrics of the Strain Dimension of Voice Quality: A Scoping Review.嗓音质量应变维度的声学指标:一项范围综述。
J Voice. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.018.
2
Minimal Detectable Change of Experienced and Novice Listeners' Ratings of Overall Severity of Voice Quality in Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia.内收型喉肌张力障碍中经验丰富和新手听众对嗓音质量总体严重程度评分的最小可检测变化
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Jul 8;68(7):3119-3132. doi: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00829. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
3
A multivariate model incorporating subharmonic measurements for evaluating vocal roughness.
一种纳入亚谐波测量以评估嗓音粗糙度的多变量模型。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 20;8(1):295. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01702-2.
4
Brazilian Consensus on the Application of Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Thyroid Nodules: A Task Force Statement by the Brazilian Society of Interventional Radiology and Endovascular Surgery (SOBRICE), Brazilian Society of Head and Neck Surgery (SBCCP), and Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM).巴西甲状腺结节热消融治疗应用共识:巴西介入放射学和血管外科学会(SOBRICE)、巴西头颈外科学会(SBCCP)和巴西内分泌代谢学会(SBEM)联合发布的专家声明
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Jun 24;68:e230263. doi: 10.20945/2359-4292-2023-0263. eCollection 2024.
5
The effect of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on speech performance: a prospective clinical and tractography study.丘脑底核脑深部电刺激对言语表现的影响:一项前瞻性临床和示踪研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Sep 16;166(1):369. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06257-x.
6
Efficacy of LSVT LOUD on Phonatory Control and Voice Quality in Patients with Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech: Case Studies.大音量语言治疗(LSVT LOUD)对原发性进行性言语失用症患者发声控制和嗓音质量的疗效:病例研究
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 24;14(5):417. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050417.
7
Effect of Akson Therapy on Acoustic Parameters in Patients with Functional Dysphonia.Akson 疗法对功能性发音障碍患者声学参数的影响。
Noise Health. 2024;26(120):1-7. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_99_23. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
8
Consensus for voice quality assessment in clinical practice: guidelines of the European Laryngological Society and Union of the European Phoniatricians.临床实践中嗓音质量评估的共识:欧洲喉科学会和欧洲小儿语音治疗师协会指南
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Dec;280(12):5459-5473. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08211-6. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
9
Speech deficits in multiple sclerosis: a narrative review of the existing literature.多发性硬化症中的言语障碍:现有文献的叙述性综述。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jul 24;28(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01230-3.
10
Comparative Analysis of Two Methods of Perceptual Voice Assessment.两种感知语音评估方法的比较分析
J Voice. 2023 Mar 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.01.005.