• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肛裂临床表现及治疗反应的重新审视

Re-examination of clinical manifestations and response to therapy of fissure-in-ano.

作者信息

Hananel N, Gordon P H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Feb;40(2):229-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02054993.

DOI:10.1007/BF02054993
PMID:9075762
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was designed to reassess clinical manifestations of fissure-in-ano, in particular, the frequency of constipation and rate of response to medical management.

METHODS

Records of 876 patients with fissure-in-ano seen between February 1975 and December 1993 were reviewed. Information gathered included age, gender, site, symptoms, bowel habits, associated anorectal problems, response, failure, and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

There were 439 women (51.1 percent) and 437 men (49.9 percent); mean age was 39.9 (range, 13.5-95) years. The fissure was located in the posterior mid line in 644 patients (73.5 percent), the anterior mid line in 144 patients (16.4 percent), both in 23 patients (2.6 percent), and only tenderness documented in 65 patients (7.4 percent). The fissure was located in the anterior midline in 12.6 percent of women and 7.7 percent of men. Dominant presenting symptoms included pain in 90.8 percent and bleeding in 71.4 percent of patients. Infrequent hard bowel movements (> or = 3 days) occurred in only 13.8 percent of patients. Mean follow-up was 26 (range, 0.5-215) months. A total of 44.7 percent of patients responded to nonoperative therapy, 60 percent of them in the first two months; of these, 18.6 percent developed recurrent symptoms. Of the latter group, 60 percent responded to further medical therapy, and 20 percent underwent a lateral internal sphincterotomy. Of the patients who initially did not respond to medical treatment (50.5 percent), lateral internal sphincterotomy was recommended.

CONCLUSION

Anterior fissures are much more common in both men and women than previously reported, and constipation and hard bowel movement are not universally present in patients with fissure-in-ano.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在重新评估肛裂的临床表现,尤其是便秘的发生率以及药物治疗的反应率。

方法

回顾了1975年2月至1993年12月期间876例肛裂患者的记录。收集的信息包括年龄、性别、部位、症状、排便习惯、相关的肛肠问题、反应、失败率和复发率。

结果

女性439例(51.1%),男性437例(49.9%);平均年龄39.9岁(范围13.5 - 95岁)。644例患者(73.5%)的肛裂位于后正中线,144例患者(16.4%)位于前正中线,23例患者(2.6%)前后正中线均有肛裂,65例患者(7.4%)仅有压痛记录。女性肛裂位于前正中线的比例为12.6%,男性为7.7%。主要的首发症状包括9�.8%的患者有疼痛,71.4%的患者有出血。仅有13.8%的患者排便次数少且大便干结(≥3天一次)。平均随访时间为26个月(范围0.5 - 215个月)。共有44.7%的患者对非手术治疗有反应,其中60%在最初两个月内有反应;在这些有反应的患者中,18.6%出现了复发症状。在复发的患者中,60%对进一步的药物治疗有反应,20%接受了侧方内括约肌切开术。对于最初对药物治疗无反应的患者(50.5%),建议行侧方内括约肌切开术。

结论

男性和女性的前位肛裂比之前报道的更为常见,并且便秘和大便干结在肛裂患者中并非普遍存在。

相似文献

1
Re-examination of clinical manifestations and response to therapy of fissure-in-ano.肛裂临床表现及治疗反应的重新审视
Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Feb;40(2):229-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02054993.
2
Randomized clinical trial of transcutaneous electrical posterior tibial nerve stimulation versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for treatment of chronic anal fissure.经皮电刺激胫骨后神经与外侧内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂的随机临床试验。
Int J Surg. 2015 Oct;22:143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.08.033. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
3
Long-term results of lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure with particular reference to incidence of fecal incontinence.慢性肛裂外侧内括约肌切开术的长期结果,特别提及大便失禁的发生率。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Oct;42(10):1306-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02234220.
4
Lateral internal sphincterotomy for surgically recurrent chronic anal fissure.外侧内括约肌切开术治疗手术复发的慢性肛裂。
Am J Surg. 2015 Oct;210(4):715-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
5
Lateral internal sphincterotomy is superior to topical nitroglycerin for healing chronic anal fissure and does not compromise long-term fecal continence: six-year follow-up of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.对于慢性肛裂的愈合,侧方内括约肌切开术优于局部应用硝酸甘油,且不影响长期的大便失禁:一项多中心、随机、对照试验的六年随访结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Apr;50(4):442-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0844-3.
6
Clinical, manometric, and ultrasonographic results of pneumatic balloon dilatation vs. lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.气囊扩张术与侧方内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂的临床、测压及超声检查结果:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jan;51(1):121-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9162-7. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
7
Internal sphincterotomy versus topical nitroglycerin ointment for chronic anal fissure.内括约肌切开术与硝酸甘油软膏局部治疗慢性肛裂的比较。
Asian J Surg. 2014 Jan;37(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
8
Reasons for failure of glyceryl trinitrate treatment of chronic fissure-in-ano: a multivariate analysis.硝酸甘油治疗慢性肛裂失败的原因:多因素分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Jun;44(6):864-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02234710.
9
Glyceryl trinitrate vs. lateral sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: prospective, randomized trial.硝酸甘油与侧方内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂的前瞻性随机试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Jan;44(1):93-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02234828.
10
Controlled lateral sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure.慢性肛裂的控制性侧方括约肌切开术
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):1037-41. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0867-6.

引用本文的文献

1
[Chronic anal fissure-Cremes or surgery?].[慢性肛裂——乳膏治疗还是手术治疗?]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep;96(9):721-727. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02336-6. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
2
Anal fissures in COVID-19 survivors: Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes.新冠病毒病康复者的肛裂:发病率、危险因素及结局
Turk J Surg. 2024 Dec 27;40(4):336-342. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6494. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Decoding the Risks of Fecal Incontinence: A Comprehensive Analysis of Closed Internal Sphincterotomy in Chronic Anal Fissure.
解读大便失禁的风险:慢性肛裂内括约肌切开术的综合分析
Cureus. 2024 Nov 22;16(11):e74216. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74216. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Is chemodenervation with incobotulinumtoxinA an alternative to invasive chronic anal fissure treatments?经皮注射肉毒毒素 A 化学切断术是否可替代侵袭性慢性肛裂治疗方法?
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03428-z.
5
The REALISE score: a new statistically validated scoring system to assess the severity of anal fissures.REALISE 评分:一种新的统计学验证评分系统,用于评估肛裂的严重程度。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Aug;25(8):935-940. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02459-y. Epub 2021 May 13.
6
Comparative Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Topical Nifedipine and Diltiazem in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure.评估外用硝苯地平和地尔硫䓬治疗慢性肛裂有效性的对比研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Nov 30;9(11):5652-5657. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_986_20. eCollection 2020 Nov.
7
Benign anorectal disease: hemorrhoids, fissures, and fistulas.良性肛肠疾病:痔疮、肛裂和肛瘘。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan-Feb;33(1):9-18. doi: 10.20524/aog.2019.0438. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
8
Anal self-massage in the treatment of acute anal fissure: a randomized prospective study.肛门自我按摩治疗急性肛裂:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(4):438-441. doi: 10.20524/aog.2017.0154. Epub 2017 May 10.
9
Myoxinol ointment for the treatment of acute fissure.用于治疗急性肛裂的迈新诺软膏。
Updates Surg. 2017 Dec;69(4):499-503. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0450-z. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
10
Stability of Hydrocortisone, Nifedipine, and Nitroglycerine Compounded Preparations for the Treatment of Anorectal Conditions.用于治疗肛肠疾病的氢化可的松、硝苯地平和硝酸甘油复方制剂的稳定性
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Jul-Aug;69(4):329-33. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v69i4.1578. Epub 2016 Aug 31.