Suppr超能文献

IRAG 工作组 2. 基于细胞活性监测的分析方法。跨部门监管替代方案小组。

IRAG working group 2. CAM-based assays. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group.

作者信息

Spielmann H, Liebsch M, Moldenhauer F, Holzhütter H G, Bagley D M, Lipman J M, Pape W J, Miltenburger H, de Silva O, Hofer H, Steiling W

机构信息

ZEBET (National Centre for Documentation and Validation of Alternatives to Animal Experiments), BgVV (Federal Institute for Health Protection of Consumers and Veterinary Medicine), Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 1997 Jan;35(1):39-66. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(96)00103-2.

Abstract

CAM-based assays, in which test material is applied to the chorion allantoic membrane (CAM) of embryonated chicken eggs, were assessed as alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Two general types of CAM-based assays are currently in use, the HET-CAM test and the CAMVA assay. Evaluations were made of five data sets produced with three different modifications of the HET-CAM test and two data sets obtained with the same CAMVA protocol. Data sets consisted of 9-133 test chemicals, usually from the sponsor's product line, and also from a validation trial. Each data set and assay protocol were analysed for quality of data, purpose and proposed use of the assay, range of responses covered, range of test materials amenable, current use in safety and risk assessment both in-house and for regulatory purposes. Since the MMAS Draize score was not available for all in vivo data sets, the sigma MMMIS, which correlates well with the MMAS, was used instead. In vitro/in vivo correlations calculated with Pearson's linear coefficient ranged from r = 0.6 to r = 0.9 for six of seven data sets. Corneal opacity and inflammation of the iris showed the best correlation to in vitro data. Prediction rates were significantly improved when partial linear regression was used, and the predictivity of three different HET-CAM protocols was almost the same. HET-CAM assays showed the best prediction with surfactants and surfactant-based formulations, whereas the CAMVA assay provided the best performance with alcohols.

摘要

基于鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜(CAM)的试验,即将受试材料应用于鸡胚的绒毛尿囊膜,被评估为替代Draize眼刺激试验的方法。目前使用的基于CAM的试验主要有两种类型,即HET-CAM试验和CAMVA试验。对采用三种不同改良方法的HET-CAM试验产生的五个数据集以及采用相同CAMVA方案获得的两个数据集进行了评估。数据集包含9 - 133种受试化学品,通常来自申办方的产品线,也有来自验证试验的。对每个数据集和试验方案都分析了数据质量、试验目的和建议用途、涵盖的反应范围、适用的受试材料范围、目前在内部安全和风险评估以及监管目的中的使用情况。由于并非所有体内数据集都有MMAS Draize评分,因此使用与MMAS相关性良好的sigma MMMIS取而代之。七个数据集中有六个数据集用Pearson线性系数计算的体外/体内相关性范围为r = 0.6至r = 0.9。角膜混浊和虹膜炎症与体外数据的相关性最佳。使用偏线性回归时预测率显著提高,三种不同HET-CAM方案的预测性几乎相同。HET-CAM试验对表面活性剂和基于表面活性剂的制剂显示出最佳预测效果,而CAMVA试验对醇类表现出最佳性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验