骡子注射麻醉方案的比较

A comparison of injectable anaesthetic regimens in mules.

作者信息

Matthews N S, Taylor T S, Skrobarcek C L, Williams J D

机构信息

Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, Texas Veterinary Medical Center, Texas A & M University, College Station 77843, USA.

出版信息

Equine Vet J Suppl. 1992 Feb(11):34-6. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1992.tb04769.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2042-3306.1992.tb04769.x

PMID:9109957

Abstract

Three combinations of injectable anaesthetic agents were compared in nine adult mules. The combinations were xylazine/ketamine (X/K), xylazine/butorphanol/ketamine (X/B/K), and xylazine/tiletamine-zolazepam (X/T). Measured variables were heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial blood pH, PCO2 and PO2, recumbency time and number of attempts to stand. Quality of induction and recovery, muscle relaxation and response to stimulus were evaluated subjectively. Recumbency time was significantly (P < 0.05) longer with X/B/K and X/T than with X/K. Mules required significantly more attempts to stand under the influence of X/T than X/K or X/B/K. No statistically significant (P < 0.05) differences in heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure or arterial pH, PCO2 and PO2 were detected between groups.

摘要

在9头成年骡子身上比较了三种注射用麻醉剂组合。这些组合分别是赛拉嗪/氯胺酮（X/K）、赛拉嗪/布托啡诺/氯胺酮（X/B/K）和赛拉嗪/替来他明-唑拉西泮（X/T）。测量的变量包括心率、呼吸频率、收缩压、动脉血pH值、PCO2和PO2、卧倒时间以及站立尝试次数。对诱导和恢复的质量、肌肉松弛情况以及对刺激的反应进行了主观评估。X/B/K和X/T组的卧倒时间显著长于X/K组（P < 0.05）。与X/K或X/B/K组相比，骡子在X/T的影响下站立所需的尝试次数显著更多。各组之间在心率、呼吸频率、血压或动脉pH值、PCO2和PO2方面未检测到统计学显著差异（P < 0.05）。