Meurer L N, Morzinski J A
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Fam Med. 1997 Apr;29(4):248-50.
Published faculty development program evaluation articles often leave the program description incomplete, making it difficult for new program planners to build on previous work. Using a model based on the work of Stuffelbeam, we examined faculty development literature for the inclusion of important program elements. We found that many important program components, including local needs assessment, leadership and resource support, stakeholder input, implementation barriers, participant attendance, and cost were each discussed in fewer than 30% of published articles. The context, input, process, and product framework is proposed as a guiding model for future program reports.
已发表的教师发展项目评估文章往往使项目描述不完整，这使得新的项目规划者难以借鉴以往的工作。我们使用一个基于斯塔弗尔比姆工作的模型，研究了教师发展文献中重要项目元素的纳入情况。我们发现，许多重要的项目组成部分，包括当地需求评估、领导和资源支持、利益相关者的投入、实施障碍、参与者出席情况和成本，在已发表的文章中讨论的比例均不到30%。本文提出了背景、投入、过程和产品框架，作为未来项目报告的指导模型。
