Van Maanen C J, Zonnenberg A J, Elvers J W, Oostendorp R A
Cranio. 1996 Oct;14(4):326-31. doi: 10.1080/08869634.1996.11745985.
Intra/interrater's reliability of the coordinates of ten anatomical landmarks on a frontal and a dorsal body posture photograph of 18 subjects was tested. The measurements were conducted by two testers with an interval of seven days between each session. The repeated measurements of each examiner (intrarater) and the first and second measurement of both examiners (interrater) were assessed for reliability. Statistical testing was performed to confirm the data to fit a normal distribution according to Shapiro-Wilks (alpha = 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficients and Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients were used to assess reliability at the alpha level of 0.05. Pearson's correlation coefficients were between 0.72 and 1.0, Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between 0.66 and 1.0. In further analysis of the results, repeated-measures paired T-tests were used to test for differences between repeated measures. After adjustment of the alpha level for the total number of comparisons, 10 of the paired T-tests were significant (2 intra; 8 inter). The results indicate that the measuring method provides reliable data and that two different test modes produce consistent measurements.
对18名受试者的正面和背面身体姿势照片上10个解剖标志点坐标的评分者内/评分者间信度进行了测试。测量由两名测试者进行,每次测量间隔7天。对每位检查者的重复测量(评分者内)以及两位检查者的首次和第二次测量(评分者间)进行信度评估。根据夏皮罗-威尔克检验(α = 0.05)进行统计检验,以确认数据是否符合正态分布。使用组内相关系数和皮尔逊积矩相关系数在α水平为0.05时评估信度。皮尔逊相关系数在0.72至1.0之间,组内相关系数(ICC)在0.66至1.0之间。在对结果的进一步分析中,使用重复测量配对t检验来检验重复测量之间的差异。在针对比较总数调整α水平后,10个配对t检验具有显著性(2个评分者内;8个评分者间)。结果表明,该测量方法提供了可靠的数据,并且两种不同的测试模式产生了一致的测量结果。