• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分担自行车头盔的费用有助于促进头盔的使用吗?

Does sharing the cost of a bicycle helmet help promote helmet use?

作者信息

Kim A N, Rivara F P, Koepsell T D

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 1997 Mar;3(1):38-42. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.1.38.

DOI:10.1136/ip.3.1.38
PMID:9113846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1067762/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether asking for a $5.00 donation for bicycle helmets, compared with distribution free of charge, would affect helmet use among children receiving helmets and an educational intervention from public health clinics.

SETTING

Six public health clinic sites in King County, Washington.

METHODS

Six participating clinic sites were randomly assigned to either free helmet distribution or to a $5.00 suggested donation for the helmets, stratified by whether a helmet law was in place. Three sites were assigned to each arm. Children who were between 6 and 12 years of age and who reported riding bicycles, but having no bicycle helmets, were eligible. Clinicians distributed helmets and delivered an educational intervention to 506 eligible children, or siblings of children seen at the clinic between March and July 1993. Parents were contacted after helmet distribution to ascertain helmet use.

RESULTS

82% of children whose parents were asked for a copayment and 77% of children who received free helmets were reported to wear their helmets every time they rode their bicycles (p=0.20). The adjusted odds ratio for the association between copayment compared with free helmets and helmet use was 1.66 (95% confidence interval 0.94 to 2.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Helmet use was not significantly different among children whose parents were asked for a small copayment, compared with those who received helmets free. Use of copayments can increase helmet use by increasing the number of helmets given to low income children.

摘要

目的

确定与免费发放相比,要求为自行车头盔捐赠5美元是否会影响从公共卫生诊所领取头盔并接受教育干预的儿童的头盔使用情况。

地点

华盛顿州金县的六个公共卫生诊所。

方法

六个参与诊所被随机分配为免费发放头盔或建议为头盔捐赠5美元,按是否有头盔法律进行分层。每个组分配三个诊所。年龄在6至12岁之间、报告骑自行车但没有自行车头盔的儿童符合条件。临床医生为506名符合条件的儿童或1993年3月至7月在诊所就诊儿童的兄弟姐妹发放头盔并进行教育干预。头盔发放后联系家长以确定头盔使用情况。

结果

据报告,要求家长支付费用的儿童中有82%以及免费获得头盔的儿童中有77%每次骑自行车时都佩戴头盔(p = 0.20)。与免费头盔相比,支付费用与头盔使用之间关联的调整优势比为1.66(95%置信区间0.94至2.92)。

结论

与免费获得头盔的儿童相比,要求家长支付少量费用的儿童的头盔使用情况没有显著差异。采用支付费用的方式可以通过增加向低收入儿童提供的头盔数量来提高头盔使用率。

相似文献

1
Does sharing the cost of a bicycle helmet help promote helmet use?分担自行车头盔的费用有助于促进头盔的使用吗?
Inj Prev. 1997 Mar;3(1):38-42. doi: 10.1136/ip.3.1.38.
2
Influence of socioeconomic status on the effectiveness of bicycle helmet legislation for children: a prospective observational study.社会经济地位对儿童自行车头盔立法有效性的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):e192-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.e192.
3
Children's bicycle helmet attitudes and use. Association with parental rules. The Pediatric Practice Research Group.儿童对自行车头盔的态度与使用情况。与家长规定的关联。儿科实践研究小组。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Dec;150(12):1259-64. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170370037005.
4
Effect of a bicycle safety program and free bicycle helmet distribution on the use of bicycle helmets by elementary school children.自行车安全计划及免费发放自行车头盔对小学生使用自行车头盔的影响。
J Emerg Nurs. 1997 Oct;23(5):417-9. doi: 10.1016/s0099-1767(97)90134-3.
5
Correlation between parental perception and actual childhood patterns of bicycle helmet use and riding practices: implications for designing injury prevention strategies.父母认知与儿童实际的自行车头盔使用模式及骑行习惯之间的相关性:对设计伤害预防策略的启示
J Pediatr Surg. 2001 May;36(5):763-6. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22955.
6
Bicycle helmet use among persons 5years and older in the United States, 2012.2012年美国5岁及以上人群使用自行车头盔的情况。
J Safety Res. 2016 Dec;59:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
7
Bicycle helmet use among schoolchildren. Impact of a community education program and a cycling fatality.学童使用自行车头盔情况。社区教育项目及一起自行车骑行死亡事件的影响
Can Fam Physician. 1994 Jun;40:1116-24.
8
Attitudes toward bicycle helmet ownership and use by school-age children.学龄儿童对自行车头盔拥有和使用的态度。
Am J Dis Child. 1990 Jan;144(1):83-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150250093041.
9
Contracting with children and helmet distribution in the emergency department to improve bicycle helmet use.在急诊科与儿童签约并分发头盔以提高自行车头盔使用率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Dec;10(12):1371-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00012.x.
10
Association between bicycle helmet legislation, bicycle safety education, and use of bicycle helmets in children.儿童自行车头盔立法、自行车安全教育与儿童使用自行车头盔之间的关联
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994 Mar;148(3):255-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170030025005.

引用本文的文献

1
Bicycle helmet use and bicycling-related injury among young Canadians: an equity analysis.自行车头盔使用与加拿大年轻人自行车相关伤害:公平性分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Jul 2;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-48.
2
Non-legislative interventions for the promotion of cycle helmet wearing by children.促进儿童佩戴自行车头盔的非立法干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD003985. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003985.pub3.
3
Cycle helmet ownership and use; a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary school children in deprived areas.自行车头盔的拥有与使用;在贫困地区小学生中进行的一项整群随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child. 2004 Apr;89(4):330-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.032052.
4
New Zealand bicycle helmet law--do the costs outweigh the benefits?新西兰自行车头盔法——成本是否超过收益?
Inj Prev. 2002 Dec;8(4):317-20. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.4.317.
5
Updating the evidence. A systematic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: part 1.更新证据。预防儿童意外伤害有效措施的系统评价:第1部分。
Inj Prev. 2001 Jun;7(2):161-4. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.2.161.
6
Bicycle helmet promotion among low income preschool children.低收入学龄前儿童的自行车头盔推广
Inj Prev. 1998 Dec;4(4):280-3. doi: 10.1136/ip.4.4.280.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a community bicycle helmet promotion campaign: what works and why.社区自行车头盔推广活动评估:哪些措施有效及原因
Am J Health Promot. 1993 Mar-Apr;7(4):281-7. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-7.4.281.
2
Bicycle helmet laws and educational campaigns: an evaluation of strategies to increase children's helmet use.自行车头盔法律与教育活动:对提高儿童头盔使用率策略的评估
Am J Public Health. 1993 May;83(5):667-74. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.5.667.
3
Evaluation of a promotional strategy to increase bicycle helmet use by children.一项关于提高儿童自行车头盔使用率的促销策略评估。
Pediatrics. 1993 Apr;91(4):772-7.
4
The Seattle children's bicycle helmet campaign: changes in helmet use and head injury admissions.西雅图儿童自行车头盔运动:头盔使用情况及头部受伤入院人数的变化
Pediatrics. 1994 Apr;93(4):567-9.
5
Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.离散和连续结果的纵向数据分析。
Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121-30.
6
Head injuries to pedal cyclists and the promotion of helmet use in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州骑自行车者的头部损伤及头盔使用推广
Accid Anal Prev. 1988 Jun;20(3):177-85. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(88)90002-4.
7
Bicycle helmet use by children. Evaluation of a community-wide helmet campaign.儿童使用自行车头盔。一项社区范围头盔宣传活动的评估。
JAMA. 1989 Oct 27;262(16):2256-61.
8
A case-control study of the effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets.一项关于自行车安全头盔有效性的病例对照研究。
N Engl J Med. 1989 May 25;320(21):1361-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198905253202101.
9
The Seattle children's bicycle helmet campaign.西雅图儿童自行车头盔运动。
Am J Dis Child. 1990 Jun;144(6):727-31. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150300127033.
10
Attitudes toward bicycle helmet ownership and use by school-age children.学龄儿童对自行车头盔拥有和使用的态度。
Am J Dis Child. 1990 Jan;144(1):83-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150250093041.