Jeffery K J
Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Hippocampus. 1997;7(1):95-110. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1997)7:1<95::AID-HIPO10>3.0.CO;2-D.
Hebb suggested, in 1949, that memories could be stored by forming associative connections between neurons if the criterion for increasing the connection strength between them be that they were active simultaneously. Much attention has been devoted towards trying to determine a) if there is a physiological substrate of such a rule, and b) if so, whether the phenomenon participates in real-life memory formation. The discovery of the electrically induced increase in synaptic strength known as long-term potentiation (LTP), in the early 1970s, demonstrated that a neural version of the Hebb rule could be observed under laboratory conditions in the hippocampus, a structure important for some types of learning. However, a quarter of a century later, the evidence linking LTP to learning and memory is still contradictory. The purpose of the present article is to review and assess the types of approach that have been taken in trying to determine whether hippocampal synaptic plasticity participates in memory formation.
赫布在1949年提出,如果增加神经元之间连接强度的标准是它们同时活跃,那么记忆可以通过在神经元之间形成关联连接来存储。人们已经投入了大量精力试图确定:a)是否存在这样一条规则的生理基础;b)如果存在,该现象是否参与现实生活中的记忆形成。20世纪70年代初,电诱导突触强度增加即长时程增强(LTP)的发现表明,在实验室条件下,在对某些类型学习很重要的海马体中可以观察到赫布规则的神经版本。然而,25年后,将LTP与学习和记忆联系起来的证据仍然相互矛盾。本文的目的是回顾和评估在试图确定海马体突触可塑性是否参与记忆形成时所采用的方法类型。