Kart T, Walther-Larsen S, Svejborg T F, Feilberg V, Eriksen K, Rasmussen M
Department of Anaesthesia, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Apr;41(4):461-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04724.x.
The aim of this study was to compare epidural infusion of bupivacaine and fentanyl and intermittent epidural morphine with regard to analgesic effect, and incidence and severity of side effects in children undergoing major abdominal or genito-urological surgery in order to improve the postoperative pain management of children.
A double-blind, block-randomised study design was used. Thirty-one children aged 3 months to 6 years undergoing major abdominal or genito-urological surgery were studied. After induction of anaesthesia a lumbar epidural catheter was placed at L3-4 or L4-5. Postoperatively, the children received either 30 micrograms/kg of morphine every 8 h or a continuous infusion of fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml and bupivacaine 1.0 mg/ml at a rate of 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1. All children additionally received rectal paracetamol in doses of 50-100 mg.kg-1.d-1 on a regular basis, and amol in doses of 50-100 mg.kg-1.d-1 on a regular basis, and if necessary supplementary intravenous morphine in doses of 50 micrograms/kg. Postoperatively, pain, administration of supplemental morphine and side effects were recorded 5 times by one observer during the day of surgery and the first postoperative day. All children had an epidural catheter throughout the study period.
Both regimens provided effective analgesia, but significantly better pain relief was obtained in children receiving the fentanyl/bupivacaine regimen. Sedation, pruritus, vomiting, and administration of antiemetics were seen in both treatment groups, and even though both the incidence and severity of side effects tended to be higher in children receiving morphine, no statistically significant difference was found. No episodes of respiratory depression or motor blockade were noticed.
Continuous epidural infusion of fentanyl and bupivacaine was found to be superior to intermittent epidural morphine. The initial regimen should be fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml and bupivacaine 1.0 mg/ml infused at a rate of 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1.
本研究旨在比较布比卡因与芬太尼硬膜外输注和间歇性硬膜外注射吗啡在接受腹部或泌尿生殖系统大手术儿童中的镇痛效果、副作用发生率及严重程度,以改善儿童术后疼痛管理。
采用双盲、区组随机研究设计。对31例年龄在3个月至6岁、接受腹部或泌尿生殖系统大手术的儿童进行研究。麻醉诱导后,于L3 - 4或L4 - 5置入腰段硬膜外导管。术后,儿童每8小时接受30微克/千克吗啡,或接受芬太尼2微克/毫升和布比卡因1.0毫克/毫升以0.25毫升·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹的速率持续输注。所有儿童均定期接受剂量为50 - 100毫克·千克⁻¹·天⁻¹的直肠对乙酰氨基酚,必要时接受剂量为50微克/千克的补充静脉注射吗啡。术后,一名观察者在手术当天和术后第一天记录疼痛情况、补充吗啡的使用情况及副作用5次。在整个研究期间,所有儿童均保留硬膜外导管。
两种方案均提供了有效的镇痛效果,但接受芬太尼/布比卡因方案的儿童疼痛缓解明显更好。两个治疗组均出现了镇静、瘙痒、呕吐及使用止吐药的情况,尽管接受吗啡治疗的儿童副作用发生率和严重程度往往更高,但未发现统计学上的显著差异。未观察到呼吸抑制或运动阻滞事件。
发现持续硬膜外输注芬太尼和布比卡因优于间歇性硬膜外注射吗啡。初始方案应为芬太尼2微克/毫升和布比卡因1.0毫克/毫升,以0.25毫升·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹的速率输注。