Ribes J A, Limper A H, Espy M J, Smith T F
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Apr;35(4):830-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.830-835.1997.
Although PCR detection of Pneumocystis carinii DNA has been described, little is known about the sensitivity or specificity of the assay in routine laboratory practice. We had the unique opportunity to use a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimen bank with samples for which the direct examination results for P. carinii were known. DNA purified from 129 selected specimens was amplified by using the primers described previously (A. E. Wakefield, F. J. Pixley, S. Banerji, K. Sinclair, R. F. Miller, E. R. Moton, and J. M. Hopkin, Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 43:69-76, 1990). Of the 129 specimens, 37 were positive for P. carinii by direct examination. All 37 specimens were positive for P. carinii by PCR, yielding a 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value for the assay. An additional 23 specimens were repeatedly positive for P. carinii by PCR but were not positive by direct examination. Review of the patient charts for these specimens with discordant results demonstrated that five of the patients were actually positive for P. carinii, as determined by either biopsy or examination of repeat or prior BAL specimens. A response to empiric therapy for P. carinii pneumonia was seen in an additional two patients. Of the remaining specimens, 8 produced no significant isolates other than P. carinii, while 12 contained culture-confirmed significant respiratory pathogens in addition to P. carinii (two fungal, nine bacterial, and one viral pathogen). Cytomegalovirus, which was of unknown significance, was isolated from 16 additional specimens. Overall, the specificity of the PCR assay was 79.3% compared to the results of direct examination. We hypothesized that the apparently poor specificity of the PCR assay was due to the increased sensitivity of the assay compared to that of direct examination. The sensitivity of the PCR assay was therefore assessed with BAL specimens containing P. carinii cysts. Serial dilutions of this preparation were evaluated by direct examination and PCR. PCR was found to be 100-fold more sensitive than direct examination, which detected one to two cysts per amplification. No false-positive results were detected in controls containing no DNA or by using target DNA from various fungal, viral, or bacterial respiratory pathogens. We conclude that PCR detection of P. carinii in BAL specimens is very sensitive and should be considered for patients whose specimens do not yield a diagnosis. The increased sensitivity of the PCR assay may help to identify those patients with low-titer infections who might benefit from directed antibiotic therapy for P. carinii and would otherwise be missed by direct examination alone.
虽然已有关于卡氏肺孢子虫DNA的PCR检测方法的报道,但对于该检测方法在常规实验室操作中的敏感性或特异性了解甚少。我们有一个独特的机会,利用一个支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)标本库,其中的样本卡氏肺孢子虫的直接检查结果是已知的。从129个选定的标本中纯化的DNA,使用先前描述的引物进行扩增(A.E.韦克菲尔德、F.J.皮克斯利、S.巴纳吉、K.辛克莱、R.F.米勒、E.R.莫顿和J.M.霍普金,《分子生物化学寄生虫学》43:69 - 76,1990)。在这129个标本中,37个通过直接检查卡氏肺孢子虫呈阳性。所有37个标本通过PCR检测卡氏肺孢子虫均呈阳性,该检测方法的敏感性为100%,阴性预测值为100%。另外23个标本通过PCR多次检测卡氏肺孢子虫呈阳性,但直接检查为阴性。对这些结果不一致的标本的患者病历进行复查表明,其中5名患者经活检或复查或先前的BAL标本检查,实际上卡氏肺孢子虫呈阳性。另外两名患者对卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎的经验性治疗有反应。在其余标本中,8个除卡氏肺孢子虫外未培养出其他重要病原体,而12个除卡氏肺孢子虫外还含有经培养确认的重要呼吸道病原体(两种真菌、九种细菌和一种病毒病原体)。从另外16个标本中分离出意义不明的巨细胞病毒。总体而言,与直接检查结果相比,PCR检测方法的特异性为79.3%。我们推测,PCR检测方法特异性明显较差是由于该检测方法相比直接检查敏感性更高。因此,用含有卡氏肺孢子虫包囊的BAL标本评估PCR检测方法的敏感性。对该制剂进行系列稀释后,通过直接检查和PCR进行评估。发现PCR的敏感性比直接检查高100倍,直接检查每次扩增能检测到一至两个包囊。在不含DNA的对照中或使用来自各种真菌、病毒或细菌呼吸道病原体的靶DNA时,未检测到假阳性结果。我们得出结论,在BAL标本中进行卡氏肺孢子虫的PCR检测非常敏感,对于标本未得出诊断结果的患者应考虑使用该方法。PCR检测方法敏感性的提高可能有助于识别那些可能从卡氏肺孢子虫定向抗生素治疗中获益但仅通过直接检查会被漏诊的低滴度感染患者。