Willems G, Carels C E, Verbeke G
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven, Belgium.
J Dent. 1997 May-Jul;25(3-4):271-8. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00007-3.
The adhesive capacity of 17 different bracket types was evaluated in an in vitro peel/shear test.
Silane-treated metal bars were used as substrates with all bonding being performed using the orthodontic adhesive Concise. The effect of aluminium oxide air abrasion on the bonding performance of recycled metal bracket bases was evaluated. Morphological examination of the bracket bases was carried out under scanning electron microscopy. Statistics analysis included one-way ANOVA with Tukey's Studentized Range Test, two-way ANOVA and Weibull analysis.
Mean peel/shear bond strength values range from 13.9 MPa for Allure Accu Arch, a ceramic bracket type, to 1.6 MPa for the plastic bracket CeramaFlex Advant Edge. Allure Accu Arch performed the best of all the ceramic brackets. However, bracket wing fracture was observed. The metal brackets Mini masters and Omni Arch showed no significant difference in bond strength compared with the ceramic bracket Allure Accu Arch (P < 0.01).
The type of the bracket base determines its adhesive capacity. Sandblasting the base of recycled metal brackets had no uniform effect.
在体外剥离/剪切试验中评估17种不同托槽类型的粘结能力。
使用硅烷处理过的金属棒作为基底,所有粘结均使用正畸粘结剂Concise进行。评估了氧化铝喷砂对回收金属托槽基底粘结性能的影响。在扫描电子显微镜下对托槽基底进行形态学检查。统计分析包括采用Tukey's学生化极差检验的单因素方差分析、双因素方差分析和威布尔分析。
平均剥离/剪切粘结强度值范围从陶瓷托槽类型Allure Accu Arch的13.9兆帕到塑料托槽CeramaFlex Advant Edge的1.6兆帕。Allure Accu Arch在所有陶瓷托槽中表现最佳。然而,观察到托槽翼断裂。金属托槽Mini masters和Omni Arch与陶瓷托槽Allure Accu Arch相比,粘结强度无显著差异(P < 0.01)。
托槽基底的类型决定其粘结能力。对回收金属托槽基底进行喷砂处理没有一致的效果。