Goh K L
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Jun;12(6):S29-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1997.tb00455.x.
The aim of the present study was to determine the risk factors for Helicobacter pylori in a dyspeptic Malaysian population. A cross-sectional survey of 1060 consecutive patients presenting with dyspepsia at the Endoscopic Unit, University Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from January 1994 to July 1995 was undertaken. All patients answered a detailed questionnaire and underwent endoscopy, with two antral biopsies taken for diagnosis of H. pylori using a rapid urease test. An overall H. pylori prevalence of 49.0% was recorded. Helicobacter pylori prevalence in relation to the major endoscopic diagnoses were as follows: non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) 31.2%; duodenal ulcer (DU) 91.4%; and gastric ulcer (GU) 74.1%. The prevalence among the races were as follows: Malay 16.4%; Chinese 48.5%; and Indians 61.8%. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified the following as independent risk factors: > 45 years old 1.5 (1.1,2.0); male gender 1.6 (1.2,2.1); ethnic group: Chinese 2.5 (1.7,3.7); Indians 4.9 (3.2,7.5); level of education: low 2.3 (1.5,3.5); middle 1.7 (1.1,2.6); and smoking 1.6 (1.2,2.3). Analysis was also performed on DU, GU and non-UD patients separately; in both DU and GU patients, H. pylori prevalence was high regardless of age, sex, race or level of education. However, in DU patients, Indian race had an independent risk factor (Odds ratio = 7.8 (1.2,48.4)). The findings in the NUD group reflected the findings in the ¿all patients' group; > 45 years old, male gender, Indian and Chinese race, and low level of education were also significant, independent risk factors. The overall differences in H. pylori prevalence between the different subgroups were mainly due to differences in the NUD group. The increased risk of H. pylori infection in Chinese and Indians points to either an inherent ethnic genetic predisposition or to socio-cultural practices peculiar to the particular race which may be responsible for transmission of the infection.
本研究的目的是确定马来西亚消化不良人群中幽门螺杆菌的危险因素。1994年1月至1995年7月,在马来西亚吉隆坡大学医院内镜科对1060例连续出现消化不良症状的患者进行了横断面调查。所有患者均回答了一份详细问卷并接受了内镜检查,同时取两块胃窦活检组织,采用快速尿素酶试验诊断幽门螺杆菌。记录的幽门螺杆菌总体患病率为49.0%。幽门螺杆菌患病率与主要内镜诊断结果的关系如下:非溃疡性消化不良(NUD)为31.2%;十二指肠溃疡(DU)为91.4%;胃溃疡(GU)为74.1%。不同种族的患病率如下:马来人16.4%;华人48.5%;印度人61.8%。多因素logistic回归分析确定以下为独立危险因素:年龄>45岁,比值比为1.5(1.1,2.0);男性,比值比为1.6(1.2,2.1);种族:华人,比值比为2.5(1.7,3.7);印度人,比值比为4.9(3.2,7.5);教育程度:低,比值比为2.3(1.5,3.5);中等,比值比为1.7(1.1,2.6);吸烟,比值比为1.6(1.2,2.3)。还分别对十二指肠溃疡、胃溃疡和非溃疡患者进行了分析;在十二指肠溃疡和胃溃疡患者中,无论年龄、性别、种族或教育程度如何,幽门螺杆菌患病率都很高。然而,在十二指肠溃疡患者中,印度种族是一个独立危险因素(比值比=7.8(1.2,48.4))。非溃疡性消化不良组的研究结果反映了“所有患者”组的研究结果;年龄>45岁、男性、印度和中国种族以及低教育程度也是显著的独立危险因素。不同亚组之间幽门螺杆菌患病率的总体差异主要归因于非溃疡性消化不良组的差异。华人和印度人幽门螺杆菌感染风险增加,这表明可能存在内在的种族遗传易感性,或者是特定种族特有的社会文化习俗导致了感染传播。