Poot J, Kooyman F N, Dop P Y, Schallig H D, Eysker M, Cornelissen A W
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Jul;35(7):1728-33. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.7.1728-1733.1997.
The potential of Cooperia oncophora excretory/secretory (ES) proteins as antigens in a serological assay which aims to establish exposure levels in cattle was assessed. ES proteins were analyzed by one- and two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. The N-terminal domains of two ES proteins were sequenced, and the corresponding cDNAs were cloned. Two cDNAs, designated CoES14.0 and CoES14.2, were expressed in Escherichia coli. The recombinant proteins were tested in an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in which crude worm antigen (CWA) was used as a reference standard. In total, 67 reference serum samples were used: 27 negative serum samples, 29 C. oncophora-specific serum samples, 7 Dictyocaulus viviparus-specific serum samples, and 4 Ostertagia ostertagi-specific serum samples. This showed respective sensitivities and specificities of 17 and 84%, 0 and 100%, and 100 and 100% by the ELISAs with the three different types of proteins (CWA, CoES14.0, and CoES14.2, respectively). Since the CoES14.2 ELISA had the best sensitivity and specificity with reference sera, its specificity was further validated in an antigen inhibition ELISA. In this assay CoES14.2 and CWA preparations of C. oncophora, Cooperia curticei, O. ostertagi, Nematodirus helvetianus, Fasciola hepatica, D. viviparus, Haemonchus placei, and Trichostrongylus colubriformus were used as competitor antigens. This experiment showed that only the homologous antigens C. oncophora CWA and CoEs14.2 resulted in 100% inhibition. The CWA preparations of all other nematodes did not affect the ELISA, even if concentrations of 250 times the 50% inhibitory concentration of C. oncophora CWA were used. These results indicate that CoES14.2 does not share cross-reactive epitopes with heterologous CWAs. Finally, we tested the CoES14.2 ELISA with sequential serum samples from naturally infected groups of animals. The optical density values that were obtained correlated well with exposure levels based on cumulative egg excretion. Thus, the CoES14.2 ELISA seems to be a very sensitive tool for estimating exposure levels in cattle.
评估了牛副蛔虫排泄/分泌(ES)蛋白作为血清学检测抗原的潜力,该血清学检测旨在确定牛的感染水平。通过一维及二维聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳和免疫印迹分析ES蛋白。对两种ES蛋白的N端结构域进行测序,并克隆相应的cDNA。两个分别命名为CoES14.0和CoES14.2的cDNA在大肠杆菌中表达。重组蛋白在间接酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)中进行检测,其中粗制虫体抗原(CWA)用作参考标准。总共使用了67份参考血清样本:27份阴性血清样本、29份牛副蛔虫特异性血清样本、7份胎生网尾线虫特异性血清样本和4份奥氏奥斯特线虫特异性血清样本。这表明使用三种不同类型的蛋白(分别为CWA、CoES14.0和CoES14.2)进行ELISA检测时,各自的敏感性和特异性分别为17%和84%、0%和100%、100%和100%。由于CoES14.2 ELISA对参考血清具有最佳的敏感性和特异性,其特异性在抗原抑制ELISA中得到进一步验证。在该检测中,使用了牛副蛔虫、柯氏副蛔虫、奥氏奥斯特线虫、瑞士细颈线虫、肝片吸虫、胎生网尾线虫、牛血矛线虫和蛇形毛圆线虫的CoES14.2和CWA制剂作为竞争抗原。该实验表明,只有同源抗原牛副蛔虫CWA和CoEs14.2导致100%的抑制。即使使用牛副蛔虫CWA 50%抑制浓度250倍的浓度,所有其他线虫的CWA制剂也不影响ELISA检测。这些结果表明CoES14.2与异源CWA不共享交叉反应表位。最后,我们用自然感染动物组的连续血清样本检测了CoES14.2 ELISA。获得的光密度值与基于累计排虫卵数的感染水平密切相关。因此,CoES14.2 ELISA似乎是评估牛感染水平的非常灵敏的工具。