Hamerschlak N, Pasternak J, Amato Neto V, de Carvalho M B, Guerra C S, Coscina A L, Ferreira O C, Rosenblit J, Szterling L N
Serviço de Hemoterapia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brasil.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1997 May-Jun;30(3):205-9. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86821997000300006.
Classical serological screening assays for Chagas' disease are time consuming and subjective. The objective of the present work is to evaluate the enzyme immuno-assay (ELISA) methodology and to propose an algorithm for blood banks to be applied to Chagas' disease. Seven thousand, nine hundred and ninety nine blood donor samples were screened by both reverse passive hemagglutination (RPHA) and indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Samples reactive on RPHA and/or IFA were submitted to supplementary RPHA, IFA and complement fixation (CFA) tests. This strategy allowed us to create a panel of 60 samples to evaluate the ELISA methodology from 3 different manufacturers. The sensitivity of the screening by IFA and the 3 different ELISA's was 100%. The specificity was better on ELISA methodology. For Chagas disease, ELISA seems to be the best test for blood donor screening, because it showed high sensitivity and specificity, it is not subjective and can be automated. Therefore, it was possible to propose an algorithm to screen samples and confirm donor results at the blood bank.
恰加斯病的传统血清学筛查检测耗时且主观。本研究的目的是评估酶免疫测定(ELISA)方法,并为血库提出一种适用于恰加斯病的检测算法。采用反向被动血凝试验(RPHA)和间接免疫荧光试验(IFA)对7999份献血者样本进行筛查。对RPHA和/或IFA呈反应性的样本进行补充RPHA、IFA和补体结合试验(CFA)。该策略使我们能够创建一个由60个样本组成的面板,以评估来自3个不同制造商的ELISA方法。IFA和3种不同ELISA筛查的灵敏度均为100%。ELISA方法的特异性更好。对于恰加斯病,ELISA似乎是献血者筛查的最佳检测方法,因为它具有高灵敏度和特异性,不主观且可自动化。因此,有可能提出一种算法来筛查血库样本并确认献血者检测结果。