Campo S, Morini S, Re M A, Monno D, Lorenzetti R, Moscatelli B, Bologna E
Divisione di Medicina, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy.
Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Jun;42(6):1184-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1018841704897.
This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of esophageal motor abnormalities, the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux, and the coexistence of gastroesophageal reflux with esophageal dysmotility in patients with intrinsic asthma. Based on clinical criteria, 34 consecutive asthmatics, 15 patients with gastroesophageal reflux, and 10 subjects with upper gastrointestinal symptoms with normal results of esophageal manometry and 24-hr esophageal pH test (controls) were studied. Esophageal motor disorders were noted in 23 of 34 asthmatics, and in 10 of 15 patients with acid reflux but in none of the subjects of the control group. A positive result of the prolonged esophageal pH study (pH in the distal esophagus less than 4 for more than 4.2% of the recording time) was obtained in 14 of 17 patients with asthma (only 17 of the original patients were tested because the others did not give informed consence for this test) and in all patients with gastroesophageal reflux. None of the members of the control group had positive test results. The findings of this study show that: (1) it is possible to identify a group of subjects with nonallergic asthma presenting with esophageal dysmotility, (2) the 24-hr esophageal pH study must be properly done in such patients; (3) esophageal motor abnormalities are often associated with positive pH results; and (4) more reflux was observed while in a supine position (especially during the night) than that observed either in control or reflux patients. Based on these results, patients with intrinsic asthma with reflux can benefit from both acid suppressive and prokinetic drugs with notable clinical implications regarding standard treatment for asthma, and those with prevalent supine compared to upright reflux could even benefit from surgery.
本研究旨在确定内源性哮喘患者食管运动异常的患病率、胃食管反流的发生率以及胃食管反流与食管运动障碍的共存情况。根据临床标准,对34例连续的哮喘患者、15例胃食管反流患者以及10例有上消化道症状但食管测压和24小时食管pH测试结果正常的受试者(对照组)进行了研究。在34例哮喘患者中有23例存在食管运动障碍,15例酸反流患者中有10例存在食管运动障碍,而对照组受试者均无食管运动障碍。在17例哮喘患者中有14例(由于其他患者未对该测试给予知情同意,仅对17例原始患者进行了测试)以及所有胃食管反流患者中,延长食管pH研究(远端食管pH小于4的时间超过记录时间的4.2%)结果呈阳性。对照组成员均无阳性测试结果。本研究结果表明:(1)有可能识别出一组存在食管运动障碍的非过敏性哮喘患者;(2)此类患者必须正确进行24小时食管pH研究;(3)食管运动异常常与pH结果阳性相关;(4)仰卧位(尤其是夜间)时观察到的反流比对照组或反流患者更多。基于这些结果,有反流的内源性哮喘患者可从抑酸药和促动力药中获益,这对哮喘的标准治疗具有显著的临床意义,而仰卧位反流比直立位反流更普遍的患者甚至可从手术中获益。