Hollander A, Van Run P, Spithoven J, Heederik D, Doekes G
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Agricultural University Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Clin Exp Allergy. 1997 Jun;27(6):617-26.
Laboratory animal workers are at high risk of developing occupational allergy. Little is known about the relationship between levels of exposure and the risk of developing laboratory animal allergy. Since laboratory animal work comprises a large number of different-often short lasting-tasks, it is of interest to assess which activities are associated with high, low or intermediate levels of allergen exposure.
To develop and evaluate highly sensitive immunoassays in order to quantify rat and mouse urinary allergens in airborne dust sampled during short-lasting tasks.
Personal air dust samples were taken during full-shift periods as well as during specific tasks in seven laboratory animal facilities. Two sandwich enzyme immunoassays were developed, using rabbit antisera against rat and mouse urinary proteins. The rabbit antibodies were analysed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblotting and compared with IgE antibodies from sensitized laboratory animal workers.
The rabbit antibodies were highly specific for rat and mouse urinary proteins and reacted with all IgE-binding allergens in either urinary protein preparation. The assays for rat and mouse urine were very sensitive, with detection limits of 0.075 ng/mL. The coefficient of variation of the analysis was 12.9% for both assays. Animal caretakers appeared to experience the highest exposure to aeroallergens. A large variation in exposure within jobs was found, due to differences between tasks performed during the sampling day and the facility worked at. The highest exposure levels were found during removal of contaminated bedding from the cages. However, rat and mouse allergen exposure levels during this task varied enormously between facilities, 1.1-158 ng eq/m3 and 0.63-2000 ng eq/m3, respectively.
Both sandwich immunoassays are highly specific and sensitive and are able to identity tasks of relatively short duration with high, medium and low exposure to airborne rat and mouse urinary allergens.
实验动物工作者患职业性过敏的风险很高。关于接触水平与患实验动物过敏风险之间的关系,人们了解甚少。由于实验动物工作包含大量不同的——通常持续时间较短的——任务,因此评估哪些活动与高、低或中等水平的过敏原接触相关很有意义。
开发并评估高灵敏度免疫测定法,以量化在短期任务期间采集的空气中灰尘中的大鼠和小鼠尿液过敏原。
在七个实验动物设施的全工作日期间以及特定任务期间采集个人空气灰尘样本。使用针对大鼠和小鼠尿液蛋白的兔抗血清开发了两种夹心酶免疫测定法。通过十二烷基硫酸钠 - 聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS - PAGE)和免疫印迹分析兔抗体,并与致敏实验动物工作者的IgE抗体进行比较。
兔抗体对大鼠和小鼠尿液蛋白具有高度特异性,并与两种尿液蛋白制剂中的所有IgE结合过敏原发生反应。大鼠和小鼠尿液的测定非常灵敏,检测限为0.075 ng/mL。两种测定法的分析变异系数均为12.9%。动物饲养员似乎接触空气过敏原的程度最高。由于采样日执行的任务以及工作的设施之间存在差异,发现工作中的接触情况差异很大。在从笼子中取出受污染的垫料时接触水平最高。然而,在此任务期间,不同设施之间大鼠和小鼠过敏原的接触水平差异极大,分别为1.1 - 158 ng eq/m³和0.63 - 2000 ng eq/m³。
两种夹心免疫测定法都具有高度特异性和灵敏性,能够识别出在相对较短时间内高、中、低水平接触空气中大鼠和小鼠尿液过敏原的任务。