• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度颅脑损伤合并持续性颅内高压患者的预后分析

Outcome analysis of patients with severe head injuries and prolonged intracranial hypertension.

作者信息

Resnick D K, Marion D W, Carlier P

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Neurological Surgery, Pennsylvania 15213-2582, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1997 Jun;42(6):1108-11. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199706000-00021.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199706000-00021
PMID:9210550
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the functional outcome of a select group of patients with severe head injuries who would a priori be assumed to have a dismal outcome and to determine prognostic factors that can be used for effective family counseling and rational utilization of scarce resources.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with severe head injuries (admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 8) with prolonged (> 96 hours) intracranial hypertension were studied. Parameters recorded included admission age, GCS, evidence of prehospital hypotension, initial computed tomography findings, intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and therapeutic intensity level.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight percent of patients in this study achieved a Glasgow Outcome Scale score (GOS) of 4 (moderate disability) or better when assessed 1 year after injury. Patients who achieved these good outcomes were significantly younger (mean 23.6 +/- 8.8 years) than patients who were severely disabled or worse (GOS 1-3) (34.3 +/- 15.0 years) (p = 0.0098). The mean admission GCS in the good-outcome group tended to be higher than that of the poor-outcome group (5.8 +/- 1.5 vs 4.8 +/- 1.6, p = 0.065). When patients with good outcomes (GOS 4 or 5) were compared with those with poor outcomes (GOS 1-3), no significant differences in mean or peak ICP, percentage of time intervals with elevated ICP, lowest recorded CPP, or length of ICP monitoring were detected.

CONCLUSION

Younger patients, particularly those with GCS > 5, have the potential for excellent recovery despite prolonged (> 96 hours) intracranial hypertension. These patients will benefit from continued aggressive ICP and CPP management.

摘要

目的

描述一组事先被认为预后不佳的重型颅脑损伤患者的功能转归,并确定可用于有效家庭咨询和合理利用稀缺资源的预后因素。

方法

研究了37例重型颅脑损伤(入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分<8)且颅内高压持续时间延长(>96小时)的患者。记录的参数包括入院年龄、GCS、院前低血压证据、初始计算机断层扫描结果、颅内压(ICP)、脑灌注压(CPP)和治疗强度水平。

结果

在本研究中,38%的患者在受伤1年后评估时格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分为4(中度残疾)或更好。取得这些良好预后的患者比严重残疾或更差(GOS 1-3)的患者明显年轻(平均23.6±8.8岁)(34.3±15.0岁)(p = 0.0098)。良好预后组的平均入院GCS往往高于不良预后组(5.8±1.5对4.8±1.6,p = 0.065)。将良好预后(GOS 4或5)的患者与不良预后(GOS 1-3)的患者进行比较时,未发现平均或峰值ICP、ICP升高的时间间隔百分比、记录到的最低CPP或ICP监测时间长度有显著差异。

结论

年轻患者,尤其是GCS>5的患者,尽管颅内高压持续时间延长(>96小时),仍有实现极佳恢复的潜力。这些患者将受益于持续积极的ICP和CPP管理。

相似文献

1
Outcome analysis of patients with severe head injuries and prolonged intracranial hypertension.重度颅脑损伤合并持续性颅内高压患者的预后分析
J Trauma. 1997 Jun;42(6):1108-11. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199706000-00021.
2
[Outcome factors in severe skull-brain trauma. A retrospective analysis of 228 (161) patients].[严重颅脑创伤的预后因素。对228例(161例)患者的回顾性分析]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2000 Feb;35(2):91-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-13006.
3
Intracranial pressure levels and single wave amplitudes, Glasgow Coma Score and Glasgow Outcome Score after subarachnoid haemorrhage.蛛网膜下腔出血后的颅内压水平和单波振幅、格拉斯哥昏迷评分及格拉斯哥预后评分。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006 Dec;148(12):1267-75; discussion 1275-6. doi: 10.1007/s00701-006-0908-0. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
4
Applying cerebral hypothermia and brain oxygen monitoring in treating severe traumatic brain injury.应用脑低温和脑氧监测治疗严重创伤性脑损伤。
World Neurosurg. 2010 Dec;74(6):654-60. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.06.019.
5
Cerebral lactate production in relation to intracranial pressure, cranial computed tomography findings, and outcome in patients with severe head injury.重度颅脑损伤患者脑乳酸生成与颅内压、头颅计算机断层扫描结果及预后的关系
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138(8):928-36; discussion 936-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01411281.
6
[Value of serial CT scanning and intracranial pressure monitoring for detecting new intracranial mass effect in severe head injury patients showing lesions type I-II in the initial CT scan].[连续CT扫描及颅内压监测对初始CT扫描显示为I-II型病变的重型颅脑损伤患者新出现的颅内占位效应的检测价值]
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2005 Jun;16(3):217-34.
7
Predictors of outcome in civilians with gunshot wounds to the head upon presentation.头部枪伤平民就诊时的预后预测因素。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):645-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.JNS131872. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
8
Hypertonic saline reduces cumulative and daily intracranial pressure burdens after severe traumatic brain injury.高渗盐水可降低重度创伤性脑损伤后的颅内压累积负担和每日负担。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):202-10. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS132545.
9
Intensive management and prognosis of 127 cases with traumatic bilateral frontal contusions.127 例创伤性双侧额部脑挫裂伤的强化治疗与预后
World Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;80(6):879-88. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.020. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
10
Role of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Management of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Results of a Large Level I Trauma Center in Southern Iran.颅内压监测在重度创伤性脑损伤患者管理中的作用:伊朗南部一家大型一级创伤中心的研究结果
World Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;94:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.122. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracranial pressure (ECP) monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): A prospective study validating intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement for predicting intracranial pressure (ICP).重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的颅外压力(ECP)监测:一项验证腹腔内压力(IAP)测量用于预测颅内压(ICP)的前瞻性研究。
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Jun 28;15:216. doi: 10.25259/SNI_108_2024. eCollection 2024.
2
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Regional Trauma Center in Incheon, Korea, 2018-2022.重度创伤性脑损伤的流行病学与预后:韩国仁川地区创伤中心,2018 - 2022年
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2024 Mar 12;20(1):17-26. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e9. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Intracranial pressure monitoring: fundamental considerations and rationale for monitoring.
颅内压监测:监测的基本考量与理论依据
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21 Suppl 2:S64-84. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0048-y.
4
Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.神经重症监护多模态监测国际多学科共识会议共识总结声明:神经重症监护学会和欧洲重症监护医学学会给医疗专业人员的声明
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1-26. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0041-5.
5
Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care : a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.国际神经危重病多模态监测多学科共识会议共识总结声明:来自神经危重病学会和欧洲危重病医学会的医疗保健专业人员的声明。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Sep;40(9):1189-209. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3369-6. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
6
An approach to determining intracranial pressure variability capable of predicting decreased intracranial adaptive capacity in patients with traumatic brain injury.一种能够预测创伤性脑损伤患者颅内适应性能力降低的颅内压变异性的确定方法。
Biol Res Nurs. 2010 Apr;11(4):317-24. doi: 10.1177/1099800409349164.