Chapman P A, Malo A T, Siddons C A, Harkin M
Public Health Laboratory, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Jul;63(7):2549-53. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.7.2549-2553.1997.
A commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (E. coli O157 Visual Immunoassay; Tecra Diagnostics) performed on enrichment cultures in modified Escherichia coli broth (mECn) was compared with immunomagnetic separation (IMS) (Dynabeads anti-E. coli O157; Dynal) performed on enrichment cultures in modified buffered peptone water (BPW-VCC) for the detection of E. coli O157 in bovine fecal samples. Tests on fecal suspensions inoculated with each of 12 different strains of E. coli O157 showed that both the EIA and IMS methods were 10- to 100-fold more sensitive than direct culture or enrichment subculture methods for detection of the organism. EIA and IMS were then compared for detection of E. coli O157 in bovine rectal swabs. For confirmation of positive EIA tests, a commercial system (Immunocapture System [ICS]; Tecra Diagnostics) was compared with IMS; both were performed on mECn enrichment cultures. Of 200 rectal swabs examined, 17 gave positive results in the EIA which were confirmed by both confirmation systems, 2 gave positive results in the EIA which were confirmed by IMS but not by ICS, and 1 gave a positive result in the EIA which was confirmed by ICS but not by IMS. Of these 20, 15 were also positive by the BPW-VCC-IMS culture system; a further 3 samples were positive by this culture system but gave a negative result in the EIA. Eight samples were negative by the BPW-VCC-IMS culture system but gave a positive result in the EIA which could not be confirmed by either confirmation system. Further examination of the eight unconfirmed EIA-positive samples yielded sorbitol-fermenting E. coli O157 from three samples. Of the remaining five cultures, four were positive in an EIA for verocytotoxins (VT) and two were positive in a cell culture assay for VT1. The remaining 170 samples were negative by both EIA and BPW-VCC-IMS. The Tecra EIA and IMS are both technically simple and sensitive methods for detecting E. coli O157 in bovine fecal samples. There was no statistically significant difference between the numbers of positives detected by the different assays (P = 0.29).
将在改良大肠杆菌肉汤(mECn)中进行富集培养后采用的商用酶免疫测定法(EIA)(大肠杆菌O157可视化免疫测定法;Tecra诊断公司)与在改良缓冲蛋白胨水(BPW-VCC)中进行富集培养后采用的免疫磁珠分离法(IMS)(抗大肠杆菌O157 Dynabeads磁珠;Dynal公司)进行比较,以检测牛粪便样本中的大肠杆菌O157。对接种了12种不同大肠杆菌O157菌株的粪便悬液进行检测,结果表明,EIA和IMS方法在检测该菌时比直接培养法或富集继代培养法敏感10至100倍。然后比较EIA和IMS检测牛直肠拭子中大肠杆菌O157的效果。为了确认EIA检测阳性结果,将一种商用系统(免疫捕获系统[ICS];Tecra诊断公司)与IMS进行比较;两者均在mECn富集培养物上进行。在检测的200份直肠拭子中,17份EIA检测呈阳性,两种确认系统均予以确认;2份EIA检测呈阳性,经IMS确认但未经ICS确认;1份EIA检测呈阳性,经ICS确认但未经IMS确认。在这20份样本中,15份经BPW-VCC-IMS培养系统检测也呈阳性;另有3份样本经该培养系统检测呈阳性,但EIA检测呈阴性。8份样本经BPW-VCC-IMS培养系统检测呈阴性,但EIA检测呈阳性,且两种确认系统均无法确认。对8份未经确认的EIA阳性样本进一步检测,从3份样本中分离出了发酵山梨醇的大肠杆菌O157。在其余5份培养物中,4份在产志贺毒素(VT)EIA检测中呈阳性,2份在VT1细胞培养检测中呈阳性。其余170份样本经EIA和BPW-VCC-IMS检测均为阴性。Tecra EIA和IMS都是检测牛粪便样本中大肠杆菌O157的技术简单且灵敏的方法。不同检测方法检测出的阳性样本数量之间无统计学显著差异(P = 0.29)。