• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业伤害的流行病学研究进展——方法与未来方向

Advancing epidemiologic studies of occupational injury--approaches and future directions.

作者信息

Burdorf A, Sorock G S, Herrick R F, Courtney T K

机构信息

Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety and Health, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):180-3. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<180::aid-ajim8>3.0.co;2-2.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<180::aid-ajim8>3.0.co;2-2
PMID:9215439
Abstract

Despite increased attention to the epidemiology of occupational injuries and work-related musculoskeletal disorders, little is known about the relative contribution of risk factors for specific injuries and diseases and effective ways to prevent them. Building on the knowledge and ideas presented in the previous papers in this special issue, this paper describes the salient issues regarding the needs and the opportunities in design, conduct, and analysis of epidemiologic research on occupational injury. There is a clear need for standardization of definitions on exposure variables and health outcomes, since basic terminology is not used consistently across studies. Improved surveillance systems with linkage to other databases offer excellent opportunities to evaluate trends in risk factors and occupational injuries. New opportunities for etiologic studies include the case-crossover design, which focuses on relations between intermittent exposures and injuries, as well as several hybrid designs that combine advantages and strength of the traditional case-control and cohort study designs. Various suggestions are presented to capture the dynamics of exposure, including both intermittent and continuous factors in the assessment strategy. The importance of cohort studies is emphasized to clarify the temporal relations between causes and effects in work-related injury research. Finally, intervention studies are much needed and a hierarchical approach is suggested, starting with observational surveys, continuing with quasi-experimental studies and concluding with randomized controlled experiments of those interventions that hold the largest promise.

摘要

尽管对职业伤害和与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的流行病学关注度有所提高,但对于特定伤害和疾病的危险因素的相对贡献以及预防它们的有效方法却知之甚少。基于本期特刊上先前论文中提出的知识和观点,本文描述了职业伤害流行病学研究在设计、实施和分析方面的需求和机遇等突出问题。由于各研究对基本术语的使用不一致,因此显然需要对暴露变量和健康结果的定义进行标准化。与其他数据库相链接的改进的监测系统为评估危险因素和职业伤害的趋势提供了绝佳机会。病因学研究的新机遇包括病例交叉设计,该设计关注间歇性暴露与伤害之间的关系,以及几种结合了传统病例对照研究和队列研究设计优点和优势的混合设计。本文提出了各种建议以捕捉暴露的动态变化,包括在评估策略中纳入间歇性和持续性因素。强调了队列研究在阐明与工作相关伤害研究中因果关系的时间关联方面的重要性。最后,迫切需要进行干预研究,并建议采用一种分层方法,从观察性调查开始,接着进行准实验研究,最后对最有前景的干预措施进行随机对照实验。

相似文献

1
Advancing epidemiologic studies of occupational injury--approaches and future directions.职业伤害的流行病学研究进展——方法与未来方向
Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):180-3. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<180::aid-ajim8>3.0.co;2-2.
2
Alternative approaches to analytical designs in occupational injury epidemiology.职业伤害流行病学分析设计的替代方法。
Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):129-41. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<129::aid-ajim4>3.0.co;2-u.
3
Design and conduct of occupational injury intervention studies: a review of evaluation strategies.职业伤害干预研究的设计与实施:评估策略综述
Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):164-79. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<164::aid-ajim7>3.0.co;2-z.
4
Methodological challenges to the study of occupational injury--an international epidemiology workshop.职业伤害研究的方法学挑战——一次国际流行病学研讨会
Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):103-5. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<103::aid-ajim1>3.0.co;2-#.
5
Three perspectives on work-related injury surveillance systems.关于工伤监测系统的三种观点。
Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):116-28. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<116::aid-ajim3>3.0.co;2-x.
6
Hazard identification in occupational injury: reflections on standard epidemiologic methods.
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002 Oct-Dec;8(4):354-62. doi: 10.1179/107735202800338678.
7
Conceptual and definitional issues in occupational injury epidemiology.
Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):106-15. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<106::aid-ajim2>3.0.co;2-x.
8
Case-crossover studies of occupational trauma: methodological caveats.职业创伤的病例交叉研究:方法学上的注意事项。
Inj Prev. 2001 Sep;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i38-42. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.suppl_1.i38.
9
[Report on the incidence of accidents and occupational diseases in the sector of waste disposal].[废物处理行业事故与职业病发生率报告]
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2007 Oct-Dec;29(4):894-7.
10
Selecting appropriate study designs to address specific research questions in occupational epidemiology.选择合适的研究设计以解决职业流行病学中的特定研究问题。
Occup Environ Med. 2007 Sep;64(9):633-8. doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.029967.

引用本文的文献

1
An effectiveness evaluation of a multifaceted preventive intervention on occupational injuries in foundries: a 13-year follow-up study with interrupted time series analysis.多方面预防干预措施对铸造厂职业伤害的效果评估:一项 13 年随访的中断时间序列分析研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Dec;84(8):867-76. doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0638-3. Epub 2011 Apr 17.
2
Prevention of injuries at work: the role of the occupational physician.工作场所伤害的预防:职业医师的作用。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Mar;79(3):177-92. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0023-1. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
3
Fatigue as a risk factor for being injured in an occupational accident: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study.
疲劳作为职业事故中受伤的一个风险因素:马斯特里赫特队列研究的结果。
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i88-92. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i88.