Zwerling C, Daltroy L H, Fine L J, Johnston J J, Melius J, Silverstein B A
University of Iowa Injury Prevention Research Center, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):164-79. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<164::aid-ajim7>3.0.co;2-z.
Occupational injuries continue to exact a great toll on American workers and their employers--the physical and financial costs are enormous. However, in the current political climate, few employers or regulatory agencies will implement injury prevention interventions without specific evidence of their effectiveness. This paper reviews the literature on the design, conduct, and evaluation of occupational injury interventions. Our review suggests that randomized controlled trials are rare and also notes that the quasi-experimental studies in the literature often use the weakest designs. We recommend a hierarchical approach to evaluating occupational injury interventions--beginning with qualitative studies, following up with simple quasi-experimental designs using historical controls, continuing with more elaborate quasi-experimental designs comparing different firms' experience, and, when necessary, implementing randomized controlled trials.
职业伤害继续给美国工人及其雇主造成巨大损失——身体和经济成本都极其高昂。然而,在当前的政治环境下,很少有雇主或监管机构会在没有具体成效证据的情况下实施伤害预防干预措施。本文回顾了有关职业伤害干预措施的设计、实施和评估的文献。我们的综述表明,随机对照试验很少见,并且还指出文献中的准实验研究往往采用最薄弱的设计。我们建议采用一种分层方法来评估职业伤害干预措施——首先进行定性研究,接着采用使用历史对照的简单准实验设计,然后采用比较不同公司经验的更精细的准实验设计,必要时实施随机对照试验。