Williams J S, Babb T G
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas 75231, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 Jul;83(1):312-6. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.1.312.
Arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) has been estimated during exercise with good accuracy in younger individuals by using the Jones equation (PJCO2) (J. Appl. Physiol. 47: 954-960, 1979). The purpose of this project was to determine the utility of estimating PaCO2 from end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) or PJCO2 at rest, ventilatory threshold (VTh), and maximal exercise (Max) in older subjects. PETCO2 was determined from respired gases simultaneously (MGA 1100) with arterial blood gases (radial arterial catheter) in 12 older and 11 younger subjects at rest and during exercise. Mean differences were analyzed with paired t-tests, and relationships between the estimated PaCO2 values and the actual values of PaCO2 were determined with correlation coefficients. In the older subjects, PETCO2 was not significantly different from PaCO2 at rest (-1.2 +/- 4.3 Torr), VTh (0.4 +/- 2.5), or Max (-0.8 +/- 2.7), and the two were significantly (P < 0.05) correlated at Vth (r = 0.84) and Max (r = 0.87) but not at rest (r = 0.47). PJCO2 was similar to PaCO2 at rest (-1.0 +/- 3.9) and Vth (-1. 3 +/- 2.3) but significantly lower at Max (-3.0 +/- 2.6), and the two were significantly correlated at Vth (r = 0.86) and Max (r = 0. 80) but not at rest (r = 0.54). PETCO2 was significantly higher than PaCO2 during exercise in the younger subjects but similar to PaCO2 at rest. PJCO2 was similar to PaCO2 at rest and Vth but significantly lower at Max in younger subjects. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that PaCO2 during exercise is better estimated by PETCO2 than by PJCO2 in older subjects, contrary to what is observed in younger subjects. This appears to be related to the finding that PETCO2 does not exceed PaCO2 during exercise in older subjects, as occurs in the younger subjects. However, PaCO2 at rest is best estimated by PJCO2 in both younger and older subjects.
通过使用琼斯方程(PJCO2)(《应用生理学杂志》47: 954 - 960, 1979),在运动期间对年轻个体的动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)进行估算时具有较高的准确性。本项目的目的是确定在老年受试者静息状态、通气阈值(VTh)和最大运动(Max)时,根据呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)或PJCO2估算PaCO2的实用性。在12名老年受试者和11名年轻受试者静息和运动期间,使用呼吸气体分析仪(MGA 1100)与动脉血气(桡动脉导管)同时测定PETCO2。采用配对t检验分析平均差异,并用相关系数确定估算的PaCO2值与PaCO2实际值之间的关系。在老年受试者中,静息时PETCO2与PaCO2无显著差异(-1.2±4.3 Torr),VTh时(0.4±2.5)或Max时(-0.8±2.7)也无显著差异,且二者在Vth时(r = 0.84)和Max时(r = 0.87)显著相关(P < 0.05)但静息时不相关(r = 0.47)。PJCO2在静息时(-1.0±3.9)和Vth时(-1.3±2.3)与PaCO2相似,但在Max时显著低于PaCO2(-3.0±2.6),且二者在Vth时(r = 0.86)和Max时(r = 0.80)显著相关但静息时不相关(r = 0.54)。在年轻受试者中,运动期间PETCO2显著高于PaCO2,但静息时与PaCO2相似。年轻受试者中,PJCO2在静息和Vth时与PaCO2相似,但在Max时显著低于PaCO2。总之,我们的数据表明,与年轻受试者的情况相反,在老年受试者中,运动期间通过PETCO2估算PaCO2比通过PJCO2更好。这似乎与以下发现有关:在老年受试者中,运动期间PETCO2不会超过PaCO2,而年轻受试者中会出现这种情况。然而,在年轻和老年受试者中,静息时的PaCO2最好通过PJCO2估算。