Suppr超能文献

将Vitek GNS F6卡检测结果与标准化参考药敏试验方法进行的批判性评估。

Critical evaluation of the Vitek GNS F6 card results compared to standardized, reference susceptibility test methods.

作者信息

Jones R N, Marshall S A, Zerva L

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242, USA.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 May;28(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(97)89157-2.

Abstract

A large number of Enterobacteriaceae (291 unselected and 30 clinical challenge isolates) were used to evaluate the accuracy of the Vitek GNS-F6 susceptibility testing card for 10 antimicrobial agents (ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, mezlocillin, ofloxacin, piperacillin, ticarcillin, and ticarcillin/clavulanate). Results were compared to reference broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods. Highest interpretive error on initial processing were observed with ticarcillin/clavulanate (very major false-susceptible error, 3.4%), imipenem (major false-resistant error, 1.9%), and ampicillin/sulbactam (minor error, 15.9%). Repeat testing resolved many very major errors (21 of 41 results), and the overall accuracy rate was improved from 92.1 to 93.4%. Analysis of all minor interpretive errors demonstrated that the trend for Vitek was to report slightly lower MICs (6 of 10 drugs; 97 of 159 results) in comparison to the reference test results. If a heavy inoculum was used in the Vitek cards, false resistance was observed more frequently with aztreonam and penicillins. These data demonstrate that susceptibility testing accuracy with Vitek GNS-F6 card based on categorical agreement varies from 83.2% (ampicillin/sulbactam) to 99.4% (ciprofloxacin) when testing enteric bacilli. Some antimicrobial agents (beta-lactamase inhibitor/penicillin combinations, antipseudomonal penicillins) may require slight modification of interpretive software. Finally, the overall accuracy of the Vitek System was greater than 91% for 9 of 10 drugs tested with a very low, acceptable rate of false-susceptible error (0.8%).

摘要

使用大量肠杆菌科细菌(291株未选择的和30株临床挑战分离株)来评估Vitek GNS-F6药敏试验卡对10种抗菌药物(氨苄西林、氨苄西林/舒巴坦、氨曲南、环丙沙星、亚胺培南、美洛西林、氧氟沙星、哌拉西林、替卡西林以及替卡西林/克拉维酸)的准确性。将结果与参考肉汤微量稀释法和纸片扩散法进行比较。在初始检测中,替卡西林/克拉维酸(非常主要的假敏感错误,3.4%)、亚胺培南(主要的假耐药错误,1.9%)和氨苄西林/舒巴坦(次要错误,15.9%)出现的解释性错误最高。重复检测解决了许多非常主要的错误(41个结果中的21个),总体准确率从92.1%提高到了93.4%。对所有次要解释性错误的分析表明,与参考测试结果相比,Vitek的趋势是报告略低的最低抑菌浓度(10种药物中的6种;159个结果中的97个)。如果在Vitek卡中使用高接种量,氨曲南和青霉素出现假耐药的情况更频繁。这些数据表明,在检测肠道杆菌时,基于分类一致性的Vitek GNS-F6卡药敏试验准确性从83.2%(氨苄西林/舒巴坦)到99.4%(环丙沙星)不等。一些抗菌药物(β-内酰胺酶抑制剂/青霉素组合、抗假单胞菌青霉素)可能需要对解释软件进行轻微修改。最后,对于所测试的10种药物中的9种,Vitek系统的总体准确率大于91%,假敏感错误率非常低且可接受(0.8%)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验