Peacock A J, Jones P L
Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Eur Respir J. 1997 Jul;10(7):1439-44. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10071439.
Since Messner and Habeler climbed to the summit of Mount Everest (8,848 m) without oxygen in 1978, there has been controversy between scientists trying to explain this feat. Field studies have suggested better respiratory performance than that found during a simulated climb in a hypobaric chamber, but the lack of data at extreme altitude has hampered the debate. We measured arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2) and alveolar partial pressure of oxygen (PA,O2) in nine subjects as they climbed from 3,500 to 8,000 m. Four of the climbers reached 8,000 m and one reached the summit. We also tested the effects of breathing supplementary oxygen on Sa,O2 at 6,550 and 8,000 m. At all altitudes tested, we found that both PA,O2 and Sa,O2 were higher than expected from low pressure chamber studies. We also found that standard rates of supplementary oxygen (2 L x min(-1)) were insufficient to restore Sa,O2 above 90% at 8,000 m. The respiratory performance of climbers at extreme altitude is better than expected from sea-level chamber studies, which may, in part, explain why humans can reach the summit (8,848 m) without added oxygen. The better performance is likely to be due to more appropriate acclimatization.
自1978年梅斯纳和哈贝勒在无氧状态下登上珠穆朗玛峰(8848米)以来,科学家们一直试图解释这一壮举,其间存在诸多争议。实地研究表明,登山者的呼吸表现优于在低压舱模拟攀登时的表现,但在极端海拔高度缺乏数据阻碍了这场争论。我们测量了9名受试者从3500米攀登至8000米过程中的动脉血氧饱和度(SaO₂)和肺泡氧分压(PAO₂)。其中4名登山者到达了8000米,1名到达了顶峰。我们还测试了在6550米和8000米时呼吸补充氧气对SaO₂的影响。在所有测试海拔高度下,我们发现PAO₂和SaO₂均高于低压舱研究的预期值。我们还发现,标准补充氧气速率(2升×分钟⁻¹)不足以使8000米处的SaO₂恢复到90%以上。极端海拔高度下登山者的呼吸表现优于海平面舱研究的预期,这可能在一定程度上解释了为何人类能够在不额外吸氧的情况下登顶(8848米)。这种更好的表现可能归因于更适宜的适应性变化。