Hook E W, Ching S F, Stephens J, Hardy K F, Smith K R, Lee H H
University of Alabama at Birmingham and Jefferson County Department of Health, 35294-0006, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):2129-32. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.2129-2132.1997.
The increased sensitivities of nucleic acid amplification tests such as ligase chain reaction (LCR) have the potential to simplify specimen collection for gonorrhea diagnosis. In this study patients took their own vaginal swab specimens for gonorrhea culture and LCR testing. Immediately following specimen collection by patients, a trained clinician obtained endocervical swab specimens for the same tests. By using LCR to diagnose gonorrhea, 54 (17.5%) of 309 patients had positive tests. Forty-five patients with positive cervical LCR tests also had positive vaginal LCR tests; for one patient, only a cervical LCR specimen was positive, and for eight patients, only vaginal specimens were positive. For specimens from patients whose gonorrhea cultures were positive, all vaginal swab specimens were positive by LCR and 42 (91%) of 46 cervical swab specimens were positive by LCR. LCR-positive specimens from eight patients with negative cultures (four with positive vaginal specimens only, one with a positive cervical specimen only, and three with positive vaginal and cervical specimens) were further evaluated with unrelated probe sets for gonococcal pilin B. Following resolution of the discrepancies between culture-negative and LCR-positive specimens, a diagnosis of gonorrhea could be confirmed for 52 of 54 patients with positive LCR tests. LCR testing with vaginal swabs was 100% sensitive and 99.6% specific and had a positive predictive value of 98.1% and a negative predictive value of 100%. In this study LCR testing of vaginal swab specimens obtained by patients themselves was significantly more sensitive for gonorrhea diagnosis of women than cervical LCR or culture (100% versus 84.6% for cervical LCR or culture; Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test result, 8.58; P = 0.003).
诸如连接酶链反应(LCR)等核酸扩增检测灵敏度的提高,有可能简化淋病诊断的标本采集过程。在本研究中,患者自行采集阴道拭子标本用于淋病培养和LCR检测。患者采集标本后,一名经过培训的临床医生立即采集宫颈拭子标本用于相同检测。通过使用LCR诊断淋病,309名患者中有54名(17.5%)检测呈阳性。45名宫颈LCR检测呈阳性的患者,其阴道LCR检测也呈阳性;有1名患者仅宫颈LCR标本呈阳性,8名患者仅阴道标本呈阳性。对于淋病培养呈阳性患者的标本,所有阴道拭子标本LCR检测均呈阳性,46份宫颈拭子标本中有42份(91%)LCR检测呈阳性。对8名培养阴性但LCR阳性患者的标本(4名仅阴道标本阳性,1名仅宫颈标本阳性,3名阴道和宫颈标本均阳性),用无关的淋球菌菌毛蛋白B探针组进行进一步评估。在解决培养阴性和LCR阳性标本之间的差异后,54名LCR检测呈阳性的患者中有52名可确诊为淋病。阴道拭子LCR检测的灵敏度为100%,特异性为99.6%,阳性预测值为98.1%,阴性预测值为100%。在本研究中,患者自行采集的阴道拭子标本LCR检测对女性淋病诊断的灵敏度显著高于宫颈LCR检测或培养(宫颈LCR检测或培养为84.6%,阴道拭子LCR检测为100%;Mantel-Haenszel卡方检验结果为8.58;P = 0.003)。