Hook E W, Smith K, Mullen C, Stephens J, Rinehardt L, Pate M S, Lee H H
University of Alabama at Birmingham and Jefferson County Department of Health, 35294-0006, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):2133-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.2133-2135.1997.
We compared the ligase chain reaction (LCR) assay to cell culture for diagnosis of genitourinary chlamydial infections in women using swab specimens obtained by clinicians from the endocervix and by patients from their own vaginas. Specimens from 40 (12.9%) of 309 patients were positive for chlamydial infection by culture, while the specimens of 50 (16.2%) patients were positive by LCR. Chlamydia trachomatis infection was verified for 9 of 10 patients whose LCR specimens were positive but whose cultures were negative. Vaginal and cervical swab specimens were positive by LCR for 46 (93.9%) and 44 (89.8%) of 49 chlamydia-infected patients, respectively. These data suggest that LCR testing for chlamydia with vaginal swab specimens obtained by patients themselves is as sensitive as cervical LCR and more sensitive than cell culture.
我们将连接酶链反应(LCR)检测法与细胞培养法进行了比较,以诊断女性泌尿生殖系统衣原体感染。临床医生从宫颈内采集拭子样本,患者从自己阴道采集拭子样本。309名患者中,40名(12.9%)的样本经培养衣原体感染呈阳性,而50名(16.2%)患者的样本经LCR检测呈阳性。10名LCR样本呈阳性但培养结果为阴性的患者中,有9名被证实感染沙眼衣原体。在49例衣原体感染患者中,阴道拭子样本和宫颈拭子样本经LCR检测呈阳性的分别为46例(93.9%)和44例(89.8%)。这些数据表明,用患者自己采集的阴道拭子样本进行衣原体LCR检测与宫颈LCR检测一样敏感,且比细胞培养更敏感。