Liu C Y, Wang S J, Teng E L, Fuh J L, Lin C C, Lin K N, Chen H M, Lin C H, Wang P N, Yang Y Y, Larson E B, Chou P, Liu H C
Department of Psychiatry, Chang-Gung Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Psychol Med. 1997 Jul;27(4):943-9. doi: 10.1017/s0033291797005230.
Two recent surveys of depression among Chinese elderly people sampled different populations, used different case ascertainment methods and resulted in a seven-fold difference in prevalence rates. The present study was conducted to compare prevalence rates obtained with two commonly used methods in the same population, and to examine the risk factors for depression.
The target population included all residents aged 65 years and over in a rural Chinese community. Participants were interviewed for demographic and medical information, examined by a neurologist and administered Chinese versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form (GDS-S), the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) and an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) form. Individuals who screened positive on the GDS-S were also interviewed by a psychiatrist for diagnosis according to the DSM-III-R criteria.
Among the 1313 participants, 26% screened positive on the GDS-S and 13% were diagnosed as having a depressive disorder, including 6.1% with major depression. Individuals with depressive disorders were more likely to have poor ADL scores, lower CASI scores, and chronic physical illnesses. They were also more likely to be female, older, illiterate and without a spouse, but adding these variables did not increase the overall association with the GDS-S score.
Depression was quite common in this Chinese rural geriatric population. The prevalence rate was twice as high when judged by depression symptomatology rather than clinical diagnosis. The critical risk factors were functional impairments, poor cognitive abilities and the presence of chronic physical illnesses.
最近两项针对中国老年人抑郁症的调查选取了不同人群,采用了不同的病例确诊方法,导致患病率相差7倍。本研究旨在比较在同一人群中使用两种常用方法得出的患病率,并探讨抑郁症的危险因素。
目标人群包括中国一个农村社区所有65岁及以上的居民。对参与者进行了人口统计学和医学信息访谈,由神经科医生进行检查,并使用中文版的老年抑郁量表简表(GDS-S)、认知能力筛查工具(CASI)和日常生活活动(ADL)表格进行评估。GDS-S筛查呈阳性的个体还由精神科医生根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)标准进行诊断访谈。
在1313名参与者中,26%的人在GDS-S筛查中呈阳性,13%的人被诊断患有抑郁症,其中重度抑郁症患者占6.1%。患有抑郁症的个体更有可能ADL评分较低、CASI评分较低且患有慢性身体疾病。他们也更有可能是女性、年龄较大、文盲且无配偶,但加入这些变量并没有增加与GDS-S评分的总体关联。
抑郁症在中国农村老年人群中相当普遍。通过抑郁症状判断的患病率是临床诊断患病率的两倍。关键危险因素是功能障碍、认知能力差和存在慢性身体疾病。