Winkleby M A, Feldman H A, Murray D M
Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1825, USA.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;50(6):645-58. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00020-6.
During the 1980s three comprehensive community-based heart disease prevention trials were conducted in the United States. The Stanford Five-City Project, Minnesota Heart Health Program, and Pawtucket Heart Health Program involved 12 cities; six received a 5-8 year multifactorial risk reduction program. This analysis pools data from the three studies to delineate the common intervention effects with greater sample size and power than could be attained by the single studies. Time trends were estimated for cigarette smoking, blood pressure, total cholesterol, body mass index, and coronary heart disease mortality risk in women and men aged 25-64 years. The joint estimates of intervention effect were in the expected direction in nine of 12 gender-specific comparisons; however, these were not statistically significant. The results illustrate the analytic challenges of evaluating community-based prevention trials and point to the smaller than expected net differences, rather than small sample size, as the reason for few statistically significant effects in the three U.S. prevention trials.
20世纪80年代,美国开展了三项基于社区的综合性心脏病预防试验。斯坦福五城市项目、明尼苏达心脏健康计划和波塔基特心脏健康计划涉及12个城市;其中六个城市接受了为期5至8年的多因素风险降低计划。本分析汇总了三项研究的数据,以确定共同的干预效果,样本量和检验效能均大于单项研究。对25至64岁男性和女性的吸烟、血压、总胆固醇、体重指数以及冠心病死亡风险的时间趋势进行了估计。在12项性别特异性比较中,有9项干预效果的联合估计值符合预期方向;然而,这些结果并无统计学意义。研究结果说明了评估基于社区的预防试验所面临的分析挑战,并指出净差异小于预期而非样本量小,是美国三项预防试验中统计学显著效果较少的原因。